Re: RFC: Adopting OSV for Vulnerability Database
- In reply to: Ed Maste : "RFC: Adopting OSV for Vulnerability Database"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2025 18:50:46 UTC
I totally agree! +1 This is defined in our goal: https://freebsdfoundation.org/blog/freebsd-ports-and-packages-security-project/ Also, the change makes strategic sense: puts FreeBSD on the radar of modern supply-chain tools. I think, making the considerations and implementation on FreeBSD Phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org) is a good start to share ideas, backlog and (offcourse) code. On 06/08/25 10:49, Ed Maste wrote: > Hello everyone, > > The Foundation has been evaluating the benefits of migrating FreeBSD > vulnerability data from our bespoke VuXML format to an > industry-recognized format. Such a migration would involve some new > workflows, tools, processes, and documentation, so I'm sharing this > proposal for comments. > > Adopting an industry-recognized format offers significant benefits as > it simplifies how external parties can consume and utilize FreeBSD > vulnerability data, and allows us to manage data with a broader range > of existing upstream tools, reducing the need for custom development. > > Providing vulnerability data in a standard format increases the > security of the FreeBSD ecosystem by facilitating seamless consumption > by a wider array of security tools and services, which will accelerate > the detection and mitigation of threats for all users of FreeBSD and > its derivatives. > > Proposed Standard: OSV (Open Source Vulnerability)[1] > > After evaluating available vulnerability standards, we recommend > adopting OSV for the following reasons: > - Broad Industry Support: OSV is supported by organizations of all > sizes, including AlmaLinux, Android, Debian, GIT, Go, PyPI, and Red > Hat. > - Existing OSV Databases: Several organizations already generate > OSV-compatible vulnerability databases. > - Independent Adoption: Organizations don't need to be under the Open > Source Vulnerability Database (OSV) umbrella, though there may be > future benefits to joining. > - Seamless Data Conversion: Bidirectional conversion is possible > between VuXML and OSV, without loss of metadata. > > Implementation Considerations > > Proof of Concept > > A proof-of-concept implementation is underway, showcasing various > ID-tag examples and potential database arrangements. Ideas for > database structure are drawn from projects like the PYPI (Python > Package Index) vulnerability database and the openSUSE OSV index. > > Repository [2]: You can explore the implementation and different ideas > in the README.md of this repository: > https://github.com/illuusio/vuln-test. This is intended to spark > discussion. > > Alternative Standards Considered > > We considered other standards but did not pursue them due to their > limitations in meeting our expected needs: > > - CSAF (Common Security Advisory Framework): While backed by OASIS and > entities like CISA and Red Hat, CSAF is more complex to implement > (e.g., file signing requirements) and has less mature tooling. While > OSV and CSAF aren't mutually exclusive, implementing an OSV database > first is significantly easier. > - OpenVEX (simplified Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange > implementation): Different purpose - used to indicate that a > vulnerability does not apply in a certain configuration (for example, > a feature that is not enabled at compile time). > > Next Steps > > We've opened a pull request adding an OSV parser to FreeBSD pkg [3]. > We would appreciate your feedback and questions on the following: > - The choice of OSV as the standard for FreeBSD vulnerability data. > - The current proof-of-concept implementation approach. > - Any concerns or suggestions for the proposed migration. > > Your input will help us refine the implementation before submitting > the necessary changes to the FreeBSD tree. > > Thanks in advance for your time and consideration. > > Ed Maste > > [1] OSV Schema: https://ossf.github.io/osv-schema/ > [2] OSV FreeBSD POC repo https://github.com/illuusio/vuln-test > [3] pkg(8) Parser PR: There's an existing pkg(8) parser pull request: > https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/pull/2453 >