Re: Blacklist
- Reply: John Levine: "Re: junk auto-acks, not Blacklist"
- In reply to: Paul Mather : "Re: Blacklist"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2026 21:07:07 UTC
On Sun, 2026-11-01 at 09:41 -0500, Paul Mather wrote: > Their Zendesk ticketing system may have been compromised The "smarter" these AI platforms are, the more likely they are to compromise themselves. If the shoehorn is connected to the refrigerator and an online ordering service, we shouldn't be surprised if the refrigerator ends up full of new shoes. There's without doubts something the networked AI just won't understand, no matter how many safety rules we build in. It's not a living being, so who knows, maybe it's like this: it's hot in the summer, so people probably like to keep their feet cool. At present, the following scenario is certainly even more likely: If companies use such a platform for their customer support to avoid having to hire customer service representatives or pay taxes to the community, why would they bother to hire enough responsible staff to keep an eye on things? No one will notice if even the simplest attack succeeds. The customers, or in this case, the victims, who aren't customers at all, will certainly speak up if something unpleasant happens. For CEOs, compliance guidelines are something like environmental awareness, they much rather spend twice as much money on appearances than on complying with regulations or raising awareness of any kind. They save money by becoming increasingly antisocial, and they don't want to waste time on tedious work when they can instead fund those appearances with the savings they make by being antisocial. Matthias Apitz’s signature mentions the German government's policies, the example he cites, military service, does not affect the old geezers themselves, any more than they are affected by cuts to social benefits, and even if they were ever affected by something themselves, such as the issue of surrogacy, they simply ignore the rules and get away with it, as in the cases of Streeck and Spahn. The real weakness in the systems isn't computer problems, but flaws in the social welfare systems that have created a divide, and instead of closing that divide, it has been allowed to widen further and further. Computers are now being used to optimize profits in an antisocial manner at the expense of the general public, which, of course, has consequences. You can't just say that we should think holistically but keep politics out of technical discourse. Technology is a political issue. We are only just beginning to feel the first, mild effects of paying the price for decades of neglect.