From nobody Sun Jun 29 15:56:30 2025 X-Original-To: questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bVYnN32p3z60NNM for ; Sun, 29 Jun 2025 15:56:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fatty.merchandise677@aceecat.org) Received: from beesty.loosely.org (beesty.loosely.org [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:4c0::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4bVYnM2B7Lz45Rs for ; Sun, 29 Jun 2025 15:56:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fatty.merchandise677@aceecat.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fatty.merchandise677@aceecat.org designates 2600:3c01:e000:4c0::2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=fatty.merchandise677@aceecat.org; dmarc=none Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=beesty ident=itz) by beesty with esmtp (Exim 4.98.1-5-133ee3edc) (envelope-from ) id 1uVuOM-0000000028w-1EP8 for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2025 08:56:30 -0700 Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 08:56:30 -0700 From: fatty.merchandise677@aceecat.org To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Root mount waiting for: CAM Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: questions@freebsd.org References: List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.90 / 15.00]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.999]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.998]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.20)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:63949, ipnet:2600:3c01::/32, country:SG]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RECEIVED_HELO_LOCALHOST(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[aceecat.org]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4bVYnM2B7Lz45Rs X-Spamd-Bar: / On Sun, Jun 29, 2025 at 11:56:36AM +0800, hlyg wrote: > my general impression is linux has less problems and support more > hardware than freebsd If you want to do such comparisons, it could be illuminating to compare the number of developers working on each, their employers (sorted by number of employees) and their approximate compensation. Taking these numbers into account, I guess I'd be much more impressed with FreeBSD. Maybe stop this thread here? -- Ian