Re: Issues with IPFW skipto Rule and Whitelisting Logic
- In reply to: Christos Chatzaras : "Issues with IPFW skipto Rule and Whitelisting Logic "
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2025 20:53:25 UTC
> My intended logic is that any IP present in table(3) should always be allowed, even if it or its subnet also appears in table(1). > > For instance, 175.178.167.241 is in table(3), while 175.178.0.0/16 is present in table(1). > > After rebooting the server and populating the tables by running the update script for the first time, access from 175.178.167.241 works correctly. However, after subsequent runs of the update script - which only updates unrelated entries and does not modify 175.178.167.241 or 175.178.0.0/16 - access from 175.178.167.241 is no longer permitted. > > Additionally, when this issue arises, adding 175.178.0.0/16 to table(3) allows access again. Even after removing that entry, as long as 175.178.167.241 remains in table(3) and I wait for any active sessions to clear, access continues to work. To add more detail: When this issue occurs, I can resolve it by just removing 175.178.167.241 from table(3) and then immediately re-adding it to table(3). These commands restores access for the IP: ipfw table 3 delete 175.178.167.241 ipfw table 3 add 175.178.167.241