Re: postgresql 16

Reply: Dag-Erling_Smørgrav : "Re: postgresql 16"
In reply to: Andrea Venturoli : "Re: postgresql 16"
Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]

From: Juan Manuel Palacios <jmpalacios_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 18:36:07 UTC

> On Dec 3, 2024, at 2:54 AM, Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> wrote:
> 
> On 12/3/24 06:55, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> 
>> why not do a:
>> pkg upgrade
> 
> Maybe the OP is using 2024Q4 port tree?
> PostgreSQL updates are often not MFH (even for security fixes).
> 
> bye
> 	av.
> 

Right, the fresh ports.org age for PostgreSQL 16 clearly shows that the port is still at 16.4 for the quarterly branch, so that could very well be the case. A simple ‘pkg -vv’ invocation would show the active packages repository.