Re: Sendmail on 14-RELEASE
- Reply: John R. Levine: "Re: Sendmail on 14-RELEASE"
- Reply: Steve O'Hara-Smith : "Re: Sendmail on 14-RELEASE"
- Reply: D'Arcy Cain : "Re: Sendmail on 14-RELEASE"
- In reply to: John Levine: "Re: Sendmail on 14-RELEASE"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 19:18:36 UTC
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 11:09 AM John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote: > > It appears that William Dudley <wfdudley@gmail.com> said: > >-=-=-=-=-=- > > > >I realize that I'm asking the wrong people this question, but what is the > >point of "replacing" sendmail with dma? > > Most freebsd machines are not used as mail servers. DMA is small and > fast and adequate to handle mail from a stub system that might have a > local mailbox or two and relays the rest of the mail to a smarthost. I would completely disagree that the machine I was asking about does not use email at all except during manual and automatic testing of a web app it is the main test/development machine it is for. Without something that can *SEND* mail it is impossible to test this functionality. Since this is a IoT medical app (remote cardiac monitoring) the email's are potentially life critical since they do stuff like tell the doctor when you have a "concerning arrhythmia" or informing the patient that their monitor is offline (or damaged in someway or another)... we use email also as txt gateway for the same purpose. So this is a case where having a fully working (but local only) MTA is critical and DMA does not cut it! > > If you do want to run a mail server, you probably want to use postfix > or exim so you don't have to deal with sendmail's antique and rococo > configuration system. Having sendmail preinstalled just gets in the > way. Not having it gets in the way took 6 hrs of fiddling to figure it out (did before I got any replies here). -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org