Re: non-parallel building of a specific port (or parts of it)
- In reply to: Felix Palmen : "Re: non-parallel building of a specific port (or parts of it)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 06:37:25 UTC
Am Fri, 2 Sep 2022 07:55:20 +0200 Felix Palmen <zirias@FreeBSD.org> schrieb: > * FreeBSD User <freebsd@walstatt-de.de> [20220902 06:37]: > > For debugging purposes I already disabled parallel builds in our test > > environment in make.conf or the appropriate counterpart located in > > poudriere's LOCALBASE folder > > (/usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf[.some_special_jail]), then > > building the port works flawless. Enabling parallel builds the let > > approx 8 out of 10 buildruns fail. > > Then you should probably file a PR on bugzilla regarding this port, it > should set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE itself. > > > I'd like do disable parallel builds preferrably only for the DOCS > > part, but it would also be all right for the port itself (build time > > is bearable), but I won't disable parallel builds in general, > > especially not for poudriere. > > .if {.CURDIR:M*/category/port} > MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE= yes > .endif > Thanks for the hint. I did so while debugging the misbehaviour of the port. Since the port uses gmake, I found that there is also an optional tag named .NOTPARALLEL: which I have declared within the specific subtree of the port - and this leaves the rest being built parallel and the documentation portion serialised. That works, too. Tahnk you very much. Kind regards, Oliver -- O. Hartmann