Re: State of LibreSSL in FreeBSD ports

* Felix Palmen <felix@palmen-it.de> [20211005 08:38]:
> If that would be consensus, I think it would be better to remove the
> option altogether. What's the point of having a totally unsupported and
> experimental option in ports anyways?

To get that straight, I think a decision is needed here.

Either libressl in ports is supported, IMHO, that would mean:

* try to push necessary patches upstream
* if that's not possible, maintain them locally
* if that's not possible (e.g. because the patch is really intrusive and
  needs to change all the time), mark the port BROKEN/IGNORE with
  libressl
* It's never ok to have a build failure

OR libressl is *not* supported, then I really think it should be removed
from DEFAULT_VERSIONS.

-- 
 Dipl.-Inform. Felix Palmen  <felix@palmen-it.de>   ,.//..........
 {web}  http://palmen-it.de  {jabber} [see email]   ,//palmen-it.de
 {pgp public key}     http://palmen-it.de/pub.txt   //   """""""""""
 {pgp fingerprint} A891 3D55 5F2E 3A74 3965 B997 3EF2 8B0A BC02 DA2A