From nobody Sat May 02 20:29:45 2026 X-Original-To: ports-bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4g7KJn4GlJz6c19n for ; Sat, 02 May 2026 20:29:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R13" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4g7KJn3Y5Nz47m9 for ; Sat, 02 May 2026 20:29:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1777753785; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rErd0o7dmIbhouOdOrWp17mVG5kvIvMT1o+2FODnsFI=; b=py9oqwu2bd23qFNy7QNjPYPANNrr7b+p4hTdHyBy3n1LPMNlD5+2usfLbHjEEU/WluoRei sLd2ParC/PxajlQudb7cy61kETAkFdl79phuYVgzy8lGKTncG8TqriPSvuxMJtERwVaFcu QmXSGyxC+e7PRcwjXKqPMU2VOICZQSbuvs1QCVTBghCaUzCjRBNYpzfNU8qWpCulwCaqtC LCBNv4sHCY9rdFW3hIf+unCMn3DM+OZjsiw4PlOecufAzyTnHAiuh7YFDIJZGd7M4N8C2/ VJQI6Y7rH2mgbeZ2AXHbipVjeuGpMLtm8tlYuQeVvLl3d4nsEuDsd9bnnVgylg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1777753785; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=SCsYw7oWOafUT2tlB9vi14MkuAklIRv/yczNu6LLFq9rYy8J5uXJ5dfclgAN0duah+myPH Sv4y7CXKWiOj+w3TFbmt82SZTCMmztacGpKQ60+pt4FaeeGOhup8jWx/9/ss3m9zsVxeTN hthUWzjcY24X7kzAIpPoCnpyUQ6Mv4DHpqoVfmAC2x/2z6aSm3Q6t30iSTyjjnZfZ7dDp0 LjNbcPpIhKaFWHEpuH6eZkng7dAVD4d/TvkGjXOAcXsAhKlQGyBH9qa0wnXCIDwqmYLrVs 6M8oJCt1uZfbT62BF2ADdqgIS0mwn9WF+9eGPCxHGR7U63OlXQ10nP6Yl5cKDQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1777753785; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rErd0o7dmIbhouOdOrWp17mVG5kvIvMT1o+2FODnsFI=; b=M+G9uN+qrlCvewDleo6xtiGXBkbmmtv6NGkx/ArHJNNDOURrirFhmm1B4wW/sxcL44gsi0 RzM7i7qVI7mIYiqXE/VP0CZBUy3K/M9qGYDPZbdgLjgwZfF8zAZhC4/lIHfRZ+HwBpiyyJ Adhv/HFLE7Kvrl10CZkF/gcrMmejhyE9MpQxUHOkkYRWmoA+9ZW1wdn1XbvZliZDsBSs2f Z6uB8RIB+cOk2zAgoPoee2XE8ipRHMa6ebNk142lochpIevwlS55e6vHFOh17dZtQijFLu KmLoCJ6XfJpqVDF2Iqqgu+whOL0DBuTOLTmk8nsUNB7XgszvHe6aZmMATuoiqw== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4g7KJn36Lwz110B for ; Sat, 02 May 2026 20:29:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 642KTj8e033401 for ; Sat, 2 May 2026 20:29:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 642KTj0M033400 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 2 May 2026 20:29:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 294962] science/paraview: v6.0+ allows runtime backend selection, we dont Date: Sat, 02 May 2026 20:29:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: milios@ccsys.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: thierry@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter flagtypes.name Message-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D294962 Bug ID: 294962 Summary: science/paraview: v6.0+ allows runtime backend selection, we dont Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: thierry@FreeBSD.org Reporter: milios@ccsys.com Assignee: thierry@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(thierry@FreeBSD.org) currently we have `OSMESA_CMAKE_ON=3D -DVTK_USE_X:BOOL=3D"OFF"` but it woul= d be great if users didnt have to give one up for the other, instead using the runtime flag --opengl-window-backend=3DGLX|EGL|OSMesa tbh i'm really not all that concerned with this; i stumbled onto this curio= sity after a build failure in science/ttk since mistakenly imagining OSMESA here only added functionality rather than implied a sorta nox11 build. (in Thier= ry's defense, the DESC does say "Use", not "Support"; twas i, the fool.) so i ju= st turned OSMESA off (the default); personally i have no clear and present use case for this combination specifically i dont know how plausible or difficult this is given our whole ecosystem of system libraries; a Kitware employee explicitly warned there must be some degree of agreement between the interfaces of different backends to use this capability to select at runtime. the discussion i found at https://discourse.paraview.org/t/compiling-paraview-with-vtk-use-x-and-vtk-= opengl-has-osmesa-simultaneously/4843 is a bit over my head and i didnt investigate to what degree this port embo= dies our ideal linking philosophy of FPHB =C2=A7 6.3 (Why Bundled Libraries Are = Bad) ive made use of libOSMesa in very different scenarios but it would not offe= nd me in the slightest if the option disappeared from this port; i imagine its= a pretty excruciating experience with any more data than fits on a bar napkin. who knows tho; might be nice --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=