[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.16.0: successor of oneVPL
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.16.0: successor of oneVPL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.16.0: successor of oneVPL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.16.0: successor of oneVPL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.16.0: successor of oneVPL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.16.0: successor of oneVPL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.17.0: successor of oneVPL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.17.0: successor of oneVPL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.17.0: successor of oneVPL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.17.0: successor of oneVPL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.17.0: successor of oneVPL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.17.0: successor of oneVPL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.17.0: successor of oneVPL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.17.0: successor of oneVPL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.17.0: successor of oneVPL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.17.0: successor of oneVPL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.17.0: successor of oneVPL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.17.0: successor of oneVPL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.17.0: successor of oneVPL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.17.0: successor of oneVPL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 293561] [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.17.0: successor of oneVPL"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2026 16:04:31 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=293561
Bug ID: 293561
Summary: [NEW PORT] multimedia/libvpl 2.16.0: successor of
oneVPL
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Some People
Priority: ---
Component: Individual Port(s)
Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Reporter: naito.yuichiro@gmail.com
Created attachment 268504
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=268504&action=edit
libvpl.patch
Intel renamed the oneVPL repository to libvpl and continues to develop it.
The latest libvpl includes new processor support and is required by HandBrake.
Currently, FreeBSD's multimedia/handbrake port disables the latest processor
support by the ports patch. The port patch is aware of the libvpl library
version. Just rebuilding with the libvpl enables all HandBrake code. So, libvpl
can be a
drop-in replacement for oneVPL except for the Python binding. It was a preview
feature and discontinued in the libvpl. I see that only HandBrake and ffmpeg
depend on oneVPL, and neither uses the Python binding.
The `libvpl.patch` adds a multimedia/libvpl port to the Ports tree. The
`handbrake.patch` changes the dependency to the libvpl port. The `ffmpeg.patch`
does the same to the ffmpeg port.
I confirmed that the HandBrake QSV encoder works with libvpl and that ffmpeg
also works with it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.