From nobody Sun May 04 19:06:43 2025 X-Original-To: ports-bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ZrDfW3sTFz5v79J for ; Sun, 04 May 2025 19:06:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZrDfW37Kfz3LPp for ; Sun, 04 May 2025 19:06:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1746385603; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YqZRLVsL4GNz2+BOUhFav0Pf0nJHld08NyQks29ROgU=; b=jc8tjvMvIKszX9dphdZmY6AW+l8elicjyPNsQjvi9XtzcnV7fgLFPu7Kw42o9OZE6E2Q5X fWOWH23aGKGL69fg0WOTZgXxF59BX6KaoWLtBi8ij9xJo5iIuJKv3RJhEYmXSGNVMi4aVk irvCOzsFjHUu4bMjX+9K+/HgXTANmFeIsgIMZ332EhPLE1bNflVeUSimoDUCxMWu9Rj2HN BBEfsg+TcTZ9OykfyuAeju1u7vDtXmIrBbebuZCK1epwEZ02F1B0HDZymGNbXdBB9JpfB6 3ZOy6sEGbXXrGmLB1GadjS1L7oUkqh8lbcSUcWPoaDpieI0CJHoHRErN1DBXsw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1746385603; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YqZRLVsL4GNz2+BOUhFav0Pf0nJHld08NyQks29ROgU=; b=Nucl4OHk3afAG4AmtRr364YBMMoZk7fL8NbrpaTHGGR34NPvzpc2J/j/zFXtQ/0PLFlV6b ZdjuvjxAmMoZdJw1rn1K1XA5yLm3BpckSFcNA4aZBENTqeeglTLvQ2vSvehiQkTw+lobTt zGnT66AM+t+01umEfTwZmKDKUthj7Gy7P/UlEX+louoZHsIBwnab82f6iDZ5uavQU2Cx6n RaxWH11JAibTlEU5Vqi7UcwgA1mgRarIPUYfKPd1sSiJtx8xlVdHyTgaoSZb7CkokkzEu9 fckeshTSn78XDfvvH7wyhjwH4YDF/xIxBCWVhf6gydNGpsN4WwYimfchgD9QsA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1746385603; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ZUsHkqo0mJdeKh2Zji8fNVeI3geXsEf8Ho9CW6IPRpv4ill5hDbnE5EOcRvALE/JCM3BYo +9ERrgEKCJtiYxIf2CdoUFjdOcK/q/Ae6t0cJ7as0koXks3yawMfl/qIj1QTz39L3GISJK xym/MlH0DOZTnIdFCgoM3ck1Y8+Dif3m6k+j2T+ycJVh01yuc1oZ0IQFQvMVXjWgsqyESB mdQYpzf9KQJ4KdxKBFWJWCgZqrPDxNZxzm85uhYkg0Hdl8GhD8TYGO0sF0qGWjurAOZi6B 6xSmVK/EVa9hEQhmcHHAs6ph2XEWeyNm8aleJByWd5NoZqMIrvGdeWkRM4M+0w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZrDfW2HMgzhKq for ; Sun, 04 May 2025 19:06:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 544J6gm3043571 for ; Sun, 4 May 2025 19:06:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 544J6gYD043567 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 4 May 2025 19:06:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 286462] devel/svn2git: update 1.0.18 ==> 1.0.20 fix WWW and take MAINTAINER Date: Sun, 04 May 2025 19:06:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: dogfood, easy X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: portmaster@bsdforge.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Overcome By Events X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D286462 --- Comment #8 from Chris Hutchinson --- (In reply to Zsolt Udvari from comment #7) I see your point. But if someone is interested in a port bug and wants to contribute. Can't they contribute to the same pr(1)? That's what I suggested in our case. I find this situation even more important where newcomers are concerned. I've been doing this since we were using CVS(1). Life was simpler back then. The ports framework was not as powerful and potentially complicated to understand as it is now. IOW it's a much higher hurdle to overcome to become a maintainer than it was back then. So somebody new to the ports system sees a port they want to maintain. They do all the reading to learn how to maintain it. But what happened here, happens to them. It was a lot of work for them. Now they find all that work was wasted and have a bad opinion of FreeBSD. We may loose a good candidate for no good reason. :( Couple of possibilities come to mind: - committers may not commit their own ports - all maintenance *must* go through bugzilla (save sweeping portmgr maintenance) All of this may be somewhat moot. As it's clear that git(1) workflows will need to be the path forward, see; git pull/ git push/... I'm currently working on a unified git based CI src/port management system. Think Git(Hub|Lab) exclusively for BSD. This will centralize all activity in a way that will greatly circumvent cases like this. :) Lastly, we're really spamming buczilla log. Which is a no-no. :O We should probably continue this off bugzilla. Please feel free to email me directly. This is a great conversation and it would be nice if we were able to find the ultimate solution. :) Best wishes. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=