[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 11:56:18 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280532
Bug ID: 280532
Summary: www/forgejo: LTS
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
Priority: ---
Component: Individual Port(s)
Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Reporter: marko.cupac@mimar.rs
CC: stb@lassitu.de
CC: stb@lassitu.de
Flags: maintainer-feedback?(stb@lassitu.de)
Hi,
according to:
https://forgejo.org/2024-07-release-v8-0/#release-schedule-and-long-term-support
... 7.X is LTS, supported until July of 2025, while newly released 8.0 (which
is now also version in ports) will be supported for three months only, the same
as the next one, 9.X.
I think it would be useful to have LTS forgejo in ports.
What would be the best way to implement it? Separate port www/forgejo-lts? Or
flavor like forgejo@default and forgejo@lts? Something else? Any reasons
against it?
Regards,
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.