[Bug 280238] security/crowdsec-firewall-bouncer: not WITH_PIE safe
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280238] security/crowdsec-firewall-bouncer: not WITH_PIE safe"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280238] security/crowdsec-firewall-bouncer: not WITH_PIE safe"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 280238] security/crowdsec-firewall-bouncer: not WITH_PIE safe"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 11:25:43 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280238 Bug ID: 280238 Summary: security/crowdsec-firewall-bouncer: not WITH_PIE safe Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: netchild@FreeBSD.org CC: marco@crowdsec.net Flags: maintainer-feedback?(marco@crowdsec.net) CC: marco@crowdsec.net Hi, the port fails to build when WITH_PIE=yes is set. I suggest to add PIE_UNSAFE=yes to the port Makefile (or fix the build with WITH_PIE, but the easy stuff of adding --buildmode=pie is already in Mk/USES/go.mk and it seems to be not trivial to get this to work in the generic case -- https://dubo-dubon-duponey.medium.com/a-beginners-guide-to-cross-compiling-static-cgo-pie-binaries-golang-1-16-792eea92d5aa). Bye, Alexander. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.