From nobody Fri Jan 26 13:36:11 2024 X-Original-To: ports-bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TLzHH5stDz5887T for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:36:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TLzHH4m8jz4GRY for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:36:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1706276171; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xtFFcTHRMZZDKvMJPJEoc+BhSjvQQyrPl5gBBRmIRSE=; b=gGSv0K4Yw1c6TY0+D7oYUu1u/EhnA85YWoYgXNwCbF4d72h9F58bGMrJvfcoWhCfFLfbRq 6gqQIKmIYIhcg/RaH9Y9iBQbNtzHMFg8NzIUd81v0D46XXpeoyQ8m1/vN0NNE4R4W0Srih /xwAFAXKtx39FIWyHfMPBnkUcH5J2KmSG6llEYniv/0ULI33ToZLJzlDO2zRUkHNNYIhQX kdb7D+mm7zZWUyU92XHwFb946E64aDopu03GmzAlJ5ipaN2T9lL+WmhqidIPiZviqdyWTW jFyJpf3eGRXGAujzQ/4B0oEtKoXResUg3VmD7kO33j/l58QsYLFOpLwpDbBxbQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1706276171; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=IPcVhNLv822BapvjiUnjcWX79fpVyxDyxS5BSJl7+qf+srWBE5NrXXB1ePV+foou7Fi0Fl 6uEhj6LVlShhGWpbDz1OAF7fl90zyKNKe1cTI4bJF8FmV7f/VIDpC4ELxC31SLu8Nfs2FE ZXtlCgojjDswQDJHKaZ04avchgtiZc9TzxYCmyDiczPOt+s9oUctU9yjFtg3PZNHYE7s6x bS/nAXiDf+xm7XNwRJQx0AT9iBK/1qztcU8O75TyypvsVWPnpNdINkF78KlytDcep8dkF5 Hb5mZe0ensdM9r2hRIfQV0kq/71MIYRBeWnLuBURXT85b4gJjsH4bKb6ctgHUg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TLzHH3lRrzkBp for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:36:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 40QDaBrE083499 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:36:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 40QDaBlB083496 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:36:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 276466] */ruby: Switch DEFAULT to 3.2 Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:36:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Ports Framework X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: mfechner@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bofh@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: exp-run+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D276466 --- Comment #20 from Matthias Fechner --- (In reply to Muhammad Moinur Rahman from comment #19) I do not see the problem that we need to do something. Exp-run shows that everything should be ok. Put I see the problem for the users of e.g. redmine50. It will not work for them, if we upgrade to new ruby version. If we upgrade to new ruby version, they can use the quarterly branch to fix problems and if we do the change now they will have a grace period of about= 8 weeks before redmine50 get unsable. If you make the ruby change 1-2 weeks before quarterly updates to 2024Q2, t= hey are under pressure to upgrade redmine to a newer version in this 1-2 week window (I do not know the upgrade process, but maybe they need to create a backup using redmine which would not be possible anymore). In my opinion waiting here just reduces the reaction period for the users. And most users will get aware of it if the application breaks, not before. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=