From nobody Fri Jan 26 02:52:59 2024 X-Original-To: ports-bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TLj180SrRz57KvR for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 02:53:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TLj1768Scz4Gkd for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 02:52:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1706237579; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UDsGp4/kRhijk7qhJ8jmCwTIsqy6P+7XgoRHbpaYuUM=; b=WhzGLLXjqQ5beaH1r9So4yFhhXdaxMuksqoEu2fcVzSckmzSQHaqBWsbhOKTkx+UFBjLCR DeyBxc2LjYHJSv/ORwPyAuDyd7td5WJcTmH9ASCCBt47a6UTx3FQs3vZuckBGxTGkJhRa9 66oAved9lFnjTBumenfq3pd+5Zt7mMrWkoAaa1/OPXZWvPjDyAK4W6jx4HK9UQ+zU2CONz o9k31PFMlcBviXLuReBFfePNQFCExwiOPXco/0LKenk+jl+opPggL2LWyv781O/FZw8jUn nGm2/fH9Jy3it8jznD6jsirTpkf78G1F6n6/V91p3ubzmYn1jTTTXDf1gOJyyQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1706237579; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=pVCbUD7lwxnPygXiutVlnoJilGCbvaH/NjJmaiank8nT8ue1x7uxLirA8DxunCwTxWgIEK Enf8s4wnbgI8zHWfXuMbOujOzWL6qGyFXT21xXbii3/feGUQMI1wm69dxFPZp4Pb/rPmL3 Im5b3WHjsIP53Cjx7Q5u7RGHr3K37gvphdOxGOWcMxBlaQBpaz/jl93t431bjI1p56Iifm xc5lA3giXaiNAb0aI5Y6UQTcunVuv6oNot0QmpjOCY/zhOCs6/dCxa4meBUCj4COcLIga0 P9IYvL5ATB5/HfgTRHSAk0MGyafPW8uuAeC4GGOl8cwh9aYiBBk5GWiq3eMSYQ== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TLj175DHNzPGC for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 02:52:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 40Q2qxMt096978 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 02:52:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 40Q2qxvp096975 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 02:52:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 276387] x11/xvt: removes DEPRECIATED and returns it to MAINTAINER Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 02:52:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: meta@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D276387 Koichiro Iwao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |meta@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #8 from Koichiro Iwao --- (In reply to Gleb Popov from comment #7) I think that it is fine to keep ports in the tree if the port has a maintai= ner still willing to maintain them and the maintainer pays some cost to keep the ports working effectively. For example, I quit maintaining net/tightvnc and marked it as deprecated because of multiple vulnerabilities, the last release was in 2009 and there= is a replacement such as net/tigervnc-{viewer,server} in ports tree. After the expiration date, it was removed from ports tree but resurrected by a new maintainer. New maintainer dinoex@ created patches to fix vulnerabilities. https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/net/tightvnc/Makefile?id=3De2ce35496e= c36b520b7a25aeea1f4111449dcf12 https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/net/tightvnc/Makefile?id=3Df374ddf115= d4f8d15c5f255c0a0be756f986bd66 Personally, I agree that x11/xvt is outdated, old-school software not widely used but I would like to respect the maintainer's decision to keep maintain this time. The trigger marking this as deprecated is the absence of a maintainer but it was an accident (domain unavailability). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=