[Bug 278129] [NEW PORT] dns/nsd-devel: desired..?
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 278129] [NEW PORT] dns/nsd-devel: desired..?"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 278129] [NEW PORT] dns/nsd-devel: desired..?"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 278129] [NEW PORT] dns/nsd-devel: desired..?"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 278129] [NEW PORT] dns/nsd-devel: desired..?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 13:02:08 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278129
Bug ID: 278129
Summary: [NEW PORT] dns/nsd-devel: desired..?
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
Priority: ---
Component: Individual Port(s)
Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Reporter: freebsd@dns.company
Created attachment 249658
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=249658&action=edit
nsd-devel 4.9.0
I made a port to install the not-yet-released NSD 4.9.0
But after many trial and error and edits, it turned out to be almost identical
to the current dns/nsd port.
After getting poudriere, portlint and portclippy all satisfied this SHAR
(attached) is what I ended up with.
I'm not sure how much demand / how usefull having a dns/nsd-devel port is / for
how long it's desired.
But I do think the current maintainer would be the appropiate portmaintainer.
Although, I could imagine Jaap doesn't want to maintain two ports.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.