From nobody Tue Apr 25 15:25:07 2023 X-Original-To: ports-bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Q5QmM72HLz47KLl for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 15:25:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Q5QmM5LZFz3jyY for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 15:25:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1682436307; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MoEhLlF5Z0tUvsItDapvhGZb6+DcXXSzrKZxj3oKRR0=; b=bCnPBfR2D3OxP44tj+GaWV+5kgrLecN09vKcvqIgX38adozVNbyl5ZFzn28MQZ+QoPwFuA tyf3Gg7hj3gMqq0C9z0gDmD5AdjUAbM/muDbEnKVGzhD5c8rtxa/T5zC501FDfApHDmxpi ZuaKWt6ZeUpkFhwNqG6wzjWuX6dc3lTRwa1eo9TurSafWwO+PD7iV/GUU30jmTbXiP/Uin XGl6hAKN+lUq2SwLtNyM28RVqs7esDgG0BUz53mrZOGWV2nufHtcwcx0+qLsz1Dtpx0We9 eZ5uRCmFMa5DFXw4/Z6KwgjC7hxwwiRhjQ8WU/lqCJAOOtomLt8ihtFbB85D2Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1682436307; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=a5VeNr7nUkjTypuCt7bAx1oHJXZ7Nb0UlXskncvvElyuQjtGfQILqXeK6eWRgzaaYfyfvO ltTgc0EpRsI8jwncfaYYd9ic4Xxu8IA9pueRI6LnEvmX5xC0qKhdL7+1AcUQQYmCeCpJ8g RBa830M/ZlCGZt9YTkXUaOJk24ZmLD5VOPIIEBE89yetZT/GIotcLS6FWOOh/hPAr3CynB NFtPp75Iqei7njqotWs3cgSe0Lk9NQbI7n8sS3ZBJ5TC7EZ5lPRqDIs3Oc/5Riwf0NpHju xFBY4Gx2KVY4YEe5bH+nM8gl3wtCZtldebX7nUQtqWvRS3SZxmtqQIM+xltbdw== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Q5QmM47G3z1CHf for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 15:25:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 33PFP7Kq035950 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 15:25:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 33PFP7JR035949 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 15:25:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 270989] print/ghostscript10: adds libgs.so; connects to USES and DEFAULT_VERSIONS facilities; flavorized Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 15:25:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: milios@ccsys.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? merge-quarterly? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D270989 --- Comment #17 from Chad Jacob Milios --- (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #15) i agree in a perfect world X11 should be made an option and FLAVOR should n= ot be used here; i was only trying to more closely mimic the installation and behavior of the version 7 8 and 9 ports. And as you pointed out however, dependant ports cannot presently enforce OPTIONS in their dependencies. it makes sense some would depend on gs-x11 (which itself depends on gs-base), = and allow others to simultaneously depend only on gs-base. The FLAVORS route (as with the separate-ports route of 7 8 and 9) was set u= p so the flavors dont conflict with one another, rather -x11 compliments -base (thats why i opted to keep those suffixes rather than go with '' vs -nox11, which to me seemed to imply based on my limited observations made thruout t= he ports tree that to have no suffix vs a -nox11 suffix would mean theyre mutu= ally exclusive rather than could get installed together, and that the no-suffix version would encompass all the functionality of the lesser and then some) As you see, ghostscript9-agpl-x11 only installs the one file X11.so (ignori= ng the obligatory LICENSE in /usr/local/share) and i sought to work as similar= ly as is prudent you're probably correct that my decision to put --disable-dynamic in the ba= se flavor and --enable-dynamic in the x11 flavor would build X11.so as utter trash. that's why you're the maintainer and i'm just a pleb :) i'm not actu= ally sure the true dependency graph between libgs.so, gsx, gs's X11.so, and/or a= ny of the ports claiming dependency on ghostscript[789]-x11. i am unclear the context and greater ramifications of {en,dis}able-dynamic. i have seen ports that USES ghostscript:x11 simply because they themselves utilize x11 yet they're perfectly fine and full featured with libgs.so, wit= hout gs's X11.so. i agree the whole tree could use some cleanup around ghostscri= pt and i'd be glad to help with that at your and/or diizzy's direction i'm currently running a handful of X11 apps through their paces to figure o= ut who actually dynamically links what exactly and why --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=