[Bug 265105] textproc/refdb: update to 1.0.3

In reply to: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 265105] [PATCH] textproc/refdb update to version 1.0.3"
Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]

From: <bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:15:47 UTC

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=265105

Fernando Apesteguía <fernape@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |needs-qa

--- Comment #8 from Fernando Apesteguía <fernape@FreeBSD.org> ---
Q/A: sqlite, mysql and pgsql are specified in both USES+= and also in
MYSQL_USES, SQLITE_USES, PGSQL_USES. The former is not necessary.

Q/A: It would be nice to have some patches regenerated so they conform to the
expected format:

WARN: textproc/refdb/files/patch-doc__Makefile.am: patch was not generated
using ``make makepatch''.  It is recommended to use ``make makepatch'' when you
need to [re-]generate a patch to ensure proper patch format.
WARN: textproc/refdb/files/patch-phpweb-index.php.in: patch was not generated
using ``make makepatch''.  It is recommended to use ``make makepatch'' when you
need to [re-]generate a patch to ensure proper patch format.
WARN: textproc/refdb/files/patch-scripts-refdb.in: patch was not generated
using ``make makepatch''.  It is recommended to use ``make makepatch'' when you
need to [re-]generate a patch to ensure proper patch format.
WARN: textproc/refdb/files/patch-scripts-refdb_latex2utf8txt: patch was not
generated using ``make makepatch''.  It is recommended to use ``make
makepatch'' when you need to [re-]generate a patch to ensure proper patch
format.

Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.