[Bug 265760] [NEW PORT] archivers/py-compressed-rtf: Compressed RTF compression and decompression package

From: <bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 20:40:54 UTC

--- Comment #1 from Jesús Daniel Colmenares Oviedo <DtxdF@riseup.net> ---
I have a question: in the Porter's Handbook, section 5.7.5. "LICENSE_FILE and

"If the file is not in the distfile, and its content is too long to be put in
LICENSE_TEXT, put it in a new file in ${FILESDIR}".

I include the license because the above is true in my case, but is it necessary
to include the license even if bsd.licenses.db.mk mentions it?

This package does not send the license in the distfile, but the license is not
unknown, although the manual does not say "only unknown license", but I guess
"with all licenses".

I have seen some ports that include the license, like
"www/py-django-smart-selects" and its includes a known license "BSD3CLAUSE". I
guess this is necessary because bsd.license.db.mk does not include the content,
only the names. is it true?

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.