From nobody Mon Aug 08 17:49:04 2022 X-Original-To: ports-bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4M1kGS5Bg7z4YdgH for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 17:49:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4M1kGS4BPQz3TV5 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 17:49:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4M1kGS3GpCz11W6 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 17:49:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 278Hn4s4025646 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 17:49:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 278Hn4AN025645 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 17:49:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 265425] [exp-run] Against llvm-15-update branch on GitHub Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 17:49:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Ports Framework X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: brooks@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: portmgr@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1659980944; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XF4lv/QueU+IBi8OIlhSAt4YfM4t9kvPf5fKJvv8smU=; b=ihOfW+vdsE/QG5QTDufhbAFx3htgioR/b+5epaSIEZY7L2fWf9PBnZwA0RzmO6VbFISrC3 NJXINDsxBcORZN2RjvwewKAr2pR6n7n29QuKB+i6pTfHNxlTSJ8Za3NuQEEcY44lzt/coz JF+FGaNrvQtVLkcqrspaDnMfepd93vACEAYQpCuwpNAJ3W65229nWXXmnut8GSPOTRD8Qh +K9CQG0eLREcNxs0ONM2Mtk8kCduT+BCX+5wNq6klhLCP4Na7LBLo1FT0OYgJB7TCvUgZl uf1imgIBp1ZqAkmhDkYPTLOreTcaPhMUIzOStF12+0rCjrrmJa1s6OLdvAUIww== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1659980944; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=EIEOsDiUNX7zara5KjoQsqijp7bV8Z1zGGlAPTnyhMnnT1tUCQ6dSgZAKNg0QQhIlODlB7 p/Nh/y+e5Dj4Ysti0CY9bB401hCZPi5mWX48jFrPKp88x9PTI8ysY/t3lzsZUg+AtcTK3Y xUFaR16zz69sq1USfvFTlPCxgeogWMJVLyi8BmfJEkQxb3jTfdOTlVRuFr4yo6uAHRrLPQ f5wB2pDQ7phNmQcF5QZ6Sl20+kyRkiGHPiPj9C0kh06vCpeSCHQ9Cg1kN3aaxWjGE/rI0o iMbiVivoEFUFMpU/Xa8izR+LlqiTbbkh5+EGzoB57Ttlrt4GwR4tWl6mSSTWfQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D265425 --- Comment #14 from Brooks Davis --- Reverting on a temporary basis sounds like it may be the right short-term solution, but it's clearly not a sustainable option. Delaying until (for example) LLVM 16 would let upstreams and some linux distros do some of the = work for us, but I don't really know how much that will help. If we do to the reverting-to-warning route, it would be good to provide a fairly reliable path for people to re-enable the errors (I'll have an llvm15 port later this week) and to notify maintainers of broken port so we can sp= read out the work. Throwing out another idea: would be be possible to more or less automatical= ly test which ports are fixed by USE_CSTD=3Dgnu89? IMO, splatting those in pre= tty indiscriminately would be fine for ports of software written to 23+ year old standards. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=