[Bug 263649] databases/py-hiredis: Update to 2.0.0
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 263649] databases/py-hiredis: Update to 2.0.0"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 263649] databases/py-hiredis: Update to 2.0.0"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 263649] databases/py-hiredis: Update to 2.0.0"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 263649] databases/py-hiredis: Update to 2.0.0"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 263649] databases/py-hiredis: Update to 2.0.0"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:36:13 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263649 Bug ID: 263649 Summary: databases/py-hiredis: Update to 2.0.0 Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: ports@skyforge.at CC: gd.workbox@gmail.com Flags: maintainer-feedback?(gd.workbox@gmail.com) CC: gd.workbox@gmail.com Attachment #233576 maintainer-approval?(gd.workbox@gmail.com) Flags: Created attachment 233576 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=233576&action=edit databases/py-hiredis: Update to 2.0.0 This patch updates databases/py-hiredis to 2.0.0. I've adapted the fixes necessary for setup.py to use our shipped version of databases/hiredis in place of the internal vendored one (which is used by default), but I am honestly not entirely sure I've gotten it right and would appreciate some feedback on this. The port builds with databases/hiredis 1.0.2 that was submitted in bug 263647. I've managed to run the tests against the installed package, where it works fine, but for some reason was unable to get test.py to pass in the test stage against the local build, hence I've not been able to include a test target. :/ Since the port doesn't build with the current hiredis version in port I've been thinking of adding a version bound on databases/hiredis, but I'm not sure how to do that with LIB_DEPENDS. :/ Any feedback on this is greatly appreciated. I will probably try and test this with a synapse worker setup to get some more reliable/in-production testing done as well. Cheers, Sascha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.