From nobody Mon May 31 19:05:10 2021 X-Original-To: ports-bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D1ABFBD71 for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 19:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fv4VY6cttz4hsc for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 19:05:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C217915B10 for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 19:05:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14VJ59n1031362 for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 19:05:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14VJ59hw031361 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 31 May 2021 19:05:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256242] mail/fetchmail: update to 6.4.19, fix dependency pollution bug in fetchmailconf's Makefile Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 19:05:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: chalpin@cs.wisc.edu X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256242 --- Comment #3 from Corey Halpin --- Both patches have an initial hunk that `patch` did not know how to handle. After removing that, both applied cleanly. mail/fetchmail passes `poudriere testport` on both amd64 and i386 under 13.= 0, 12.2, and 11.4 for the following configurations: - Default settings=20 - ssl=3Dbase, GSSAPI_MIT - ssl=3Dbase, GSSAPI_NONE - ssl=3Dopenssl - ssl=3Dopenssl with SSL2 and SSL3 disabled - ssl=3Dopenssl, GSSAPI_NONE - ssl=3Dlibressl - ssl=3Dlibressl, GSSAPI_NONE mail/fetchmailconf passes `poudriere testport` on both amd64 and i386 under 13.0, 12.2, and 11.4 with default settings. I also tested a 'build as non-root' configuration. It passed under 12.2/amd= 64, 12.2/i386, 11.4/amd64, and 11.4/i386 but encountered a build failure in indexinfo-0.3.1 (which was pulled in as a dependency of gmake) on 13.0/amd64 and 13.0/i486; I suspect this is an issue with my `poudriere` configuration rather than any genuine issue in either indexinfo or fetchmail. I do not th= ink this update needs to wait while I debug my configuration. When installed, the built package works nicely in my testing. Assuming that trimming off the initial hunk that confused `patch` was the r= ight thing, then I approve the resulting change. Thank you! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=