Re: 3 platform combinations not having base_latest built [the 3 stayed old, not updating]

On 4/5/26 16:36, Philip Paeps wrote:
> On 2026-04-06 01:07:39 (+0800), Mark Millard wrote:
>> On 4/5/26 01:56, Philip Paeps wrote:
>>> On 2026-04-05 14:46:12 (+0800), Philip Paeps wrote:
>>>> On 2026-04-05 12:46:33 (+0800), Mark Millard wrote:
>>>>> https://people.freebsd.org/~dbaio/pkg-master-report.html does not
>>>>> show any "missing" rows for any of the 3.
>>>>>
>>>>> Most recent (the only) updates listed for the 3:
>>>>>
>>>>> 2026-03-20 12:00:02Z freebsd:16:powerpc:64:eb
>>>>> 2026-03-27 00:00:01Z freebsd:15:x86:32
>>>>> 2026-03-27 00:00:02Z freebsd:15:armv7:32:el:eabi:hardfp
>>>>
>>>> One of our mirrors broke and builds are not being made visible until
>>>> it's fixed.
>>
>> I expect that is why everything else other than the 3 had multiple
>> rows of "missing" categorizations. (They also had more recent
>> "present" base_latest rows than the 3 listed above.)
>>
>> I expect that the 3 are a different issue of failed/lack-of newer builds.
> 
> Right.  Sorry.  I misread your email. :)
> 
>>>> I'm working on it.
>>>
>>> The broken mirror is no longer broken.  It'll take a bit of time to
>>> catch up but builds are being pushed and made visible again.
>>
>> All the base_latest rows now indicate "present", no examples of
>> "missing".
>>
>> But the 3 that I reported still have only the old dates/times, same
>> dates/times as indicated above in my original note. Not your problem
>> to solve as far as I can tell.
> 
> Mhm.  Yes.  I think this is more a matter of they're simply not being
> built than that they're not syncing.
> 
> freebsd:15:x86:32 is normal: we don't support FreeBSD 15.x on i386. 

pkgbase has been unofficially building some stable/{15,16}/ builds that
have had no referencing material on https://www.freebsd.org/platforms/
or on https://pkg.freebsd.org/ for some time.

https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:i386/ is still populated.

I assume such is deliberate for development testing or such reasons
while avoiding messing up official distributions, not for release reasons.

So I reported freebsd:15:x86:32 since the 2026-03-27 build is a recent
and lack of updates is a change, just to make sure it was noticed. I've
no means of knowing on my own if it was a deliberate stop of the build.

freebsd:16:x86:32 is still being built with the other freebsd:16:* and
is also not listed on https://www.freebsd.org/platforms/ or on
https://pkg.freebsd.org/ . But it does not have a populated/accessible
https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:16:i386/ .

I was not trying to object to the status either, just noting changes of
recent status to freebsd:15:x86:32 . I do not use either one.

> freebsd:15:armv7:32:el:eabi:hardfp and freebsd:16:powerpc:64:eb are
> still Tier 2 so they ought to be built.

Yep. The expected status for these two is clear, given
https://www.freebsd.org/platforms/ and https://pkg.freebsd.org/ .

> 
> Philip
> 
> 


-- 
===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com