Re: poudriere bulk results: no end result for a queued port (was: FYI: 15stable-amd64-quarterly has had 2 successful builds, despite not being distributed yet)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 06:17:05 UTC
On Oct 9, 2025, at 22:30, Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/10/2025 04:57, Mark Millard wrote:
>> Build Status Started (UTC) Elapsed
>> 9a9cbb37913d done: Tue, 07 Oct 2025 08:51:36 GMT 13:00:53
>> 24fedaeb4e97 done: Thu, 09 Oct 2025 01:03:13 GMT 11:35:38
>>
>> For reference:
>>
>> https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/beefy21/build.html?mastername=15stable-amd64-quarterly&build=9a9cbb37913d
>> https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/beefy21/build.html?mastername=15stable-amd64-quarterly&build=24fedaeb4e97
>>
>>
>> (Prior but larger-partial builds contributed.)
>
>
> I'm mystified when a port is queued but then, no end result when the build is done.
>
> Build 24fedaeb4e97, for example, x11/kde is in none of these four sets of results:
>
> built
> failed
> skipped
> ignored
There are differ stages of being queued(/filtered) but
there is also bad terminology reuse involved in the
presentation.
Initial "Queued ports" stage reports:
"Showing 1 to 10 of 37,164 entries". That 37,164
appears to be the total number of potential
port-packages across all the ports for 2025Q4's
quarterly as of the snapshot used for 24fedaeb4e97.
Later (top of page)
Filtered stage: "Queued" "992"
(my terminology)
Note:
Built + Failed + Skipped + Ignored
== 373 + 152 + 121 + 346
== 992
== Filtered stage: Queued 992
So they match just fine. 37164-992==36172
port-packages will not be in any of the
4 categories above.
The vast majority of the port-packages that were
built overall were built in 2 prior bulk runs that
failed to complete ( were partial, e3fa556c9a50 and
d1f407b76f7a ). Both such failures lead to a
manually initiated "sigterm:" status. All 4 builds
were on beefy21.
I do not see much mystery here.
I will also note that the counting can end up
with Remaining -1 on occasion, even when the
build otherwise works normally. I do not know what
contributes to that.
===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com