From nobody Mon Oct 11 20:00:48 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A60C180207E for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 20:00:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HSqRR3MvGz4flS; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 20:00:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from venus.codepro.be (venus.codepro.be [5.9.86.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.codepro.be", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: kp) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 38EDA1E56; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 20:00:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: by venus.codepro.be (Postfix, authenticated sender kp) id 2471145591; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:00:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Kristof Provost To: =?utf-8?q?=C3=96zkan?= KIRIK Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf label $nr macro expand reproducable bug Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:00:48 +0200 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5818) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <90E32279-76C0-4D81-B209-BE85A181F874@FreeBSD.org> <424C24F1-D9E2-494E-97C1-6ADC515869D0@FreeBSD.org> List-Id: Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter (pf) List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pf List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam: Yes X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 11 Oct 2021, at 5:41, =C3=96zkan KIRIK wrote: > Hello Kristof, > I didn't have time to test the patch before. But the patch couldn't > be applied successfully. > I=E2=80=99m not entirely surprised it doesn=E2=80=99t apply on stable/12 = without conflicts. New work gets done on main first, after all. I=E2=80=99m working on an improved version, but am currently very short o= n time for this sort of thing. Best regards, Kristof