freebsd-numerics@FreeBSD.org
Discussions of high quality implementation of libm functions
September 2025 Archives by thread
- Fwd: Accuracy of Mathematical Functions: Pedro Giffuni (Mon, 01 Sep 2025 19:46:57 UTC)
- [Bug 289447] [libm] Fix cpow[fl]() to be consistent with pow[fl]() and glibc: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Wed, 10 Sep 2025 21:37:48 UTC)
- [Bug 289447] [libm] Fix cpow[fl]() to be consistent with pow[fl]() and glibc: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Thu, 11 Sep 2025 09:41:57 UTC)
- [Bug 289447] [libm] Fix cpow[fl]() to be consistent with pow[fl]() and glibc: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Thu, 11 Sep 2025 15:47:44 UTC)
- [Bug 289447] [libm] Fix cpow[fl]() to be consistent with pow[fl]() and glibc: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Thu, 11 Sep 2025 15:55:12 UTC)
- [Bug 289447] [libm] Fix cpow[fl]() to be consistent with pow[fl]() and glibc: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Fri, 12 Sep 2025 02:37:40 UTC)
- [Bug 289447] [libm] Fix cpow[fl]() to be consistent with pow[fl]() and glibc: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Fri, 12 Sep 2025 17:03:55 UTC)
- [Bug 289447] [libm] Fix cpow[fl]() to be consistent with pow[fl]() and glibc: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Fri, 19 Sep 2025 01:00:26 UTC)
- [Bug 289447] [libm] Fix cpow[fl]() to be consistent with pow[fl]() and glibc: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Fri, 19 Sep 2025 01:01:28 UTC)
- [Bug 289447] [libm] Fix cpow[fl]() to be consistent with pow[fl]() and glibc: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Fri, 19 Sep 2025 01:01:50 UTC)