Re: bridge new vlan and iftagged "none"
- Reply: Lexi Winter : "Re: bridge new vlan and iftagged "none""
- In reply to: Lexi Winter : "Re: bridge new vlan and iftagged "none""
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 12:16:20 UTC
Op 04-09-2025 om 14:03 schreef Lexi Winter: > Lexi Winter: >> Ronald Klop: >>> With the story above is the patch still needed? I will test anyway to >>> see what happens. It is a RPI4, so compiling is a bit slow. >> >> i was able to reproduce the problem here so it's not too important to >> test that if it's a hassle. > > there's a better patch at [0]. if you are going to test this, i'd > appreciate it if you'd test that rather than the patch i originally > sent. sorry, i realise compiling on that hardware does take a while :-) > > [0] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D52380 Thanks, I will test in the near future. NB: I don't know if my setup fits your setup in relation to where "host" traffic originates. My bridge does not have an IP address itself. I prefer to add an epair for local traffic. genet0 <--> bridge0 <--> epair0a <--> epair0b And in rc.conf: ifconfig_epair0b="SYNCDHCP" ifconfig_epair0b_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv" This makes that epair0b is the interface of the host. I like this setup as IMHO it mimics more how a host is connected to a switch. In this way my host is next to the jails in the bridge. Things like tcpdump-ing epair0b vs bridge0 are more predictable to me. Regards, Ronald.