From nobody Thu Sep 04 12:03:19 2025 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4cHdRN2B7Dz65sfw for ; Thu, 04 Sep 2025 12:03:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R13" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cHdRN0z07z4Ld0; Thu, 04 Sep 2025 12:03:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1756987408; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QfwiM+uaQoZbE00J4TfQa2mmxolJCqFgJPSgbBPeTTE=; b=PxjMPPkhpvoHSrLKwPQig8/bb4Xg1bKGjLGlVOXOoz6t2DftDaF2RH+dIiGe5wfJcaiDKT mAoFrNYy1ccSMquOz460wcAjUoTUvMkCwsmo9wu06I7VlVDHG6lNKFZktdL8fXDBbzBIRd tGpgofRJQutL+krV+4hAbomrVDTkNMpxeMdmJwJr0l6w9PuL8DCjydO+mXDq74DirzmzDU +M01iNg6h3yVnojlWTooArskpIP0UUzUjylneyiPwIQ+rnhfx8Yrb43XEcyWsKYUs2s3jw l7X7Jb6tB8M/9hlYkExzPtTe2fFRJ6+dhnnZ1nSEOM/DFRs//46u3/j6ER3rfA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1756987408; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QfwiM+uaQoZbE00J4TfQa2mmxolJCqFgJPSgbBPeTTE=; b=i9MZqPzPz63I2s0dTJ2mD0ZCoppH+679GTvLbQdW91bTxHcbLs2b4KZbRDn6k5x74vL1Qa 4UlCA7SxG1KqucEUs7BW3oQ98R4l2ew3mST7mpzInwNkndgI0IP9KR1vQQP4V0QkFsozsh D61Ieg3OeCSJLT+0u0BNMjA3QJn6FLl7tAueVFCu4FBdTvqr24z/8l/d5ZIeXH5Pq2vTzt IPSABmAhbRdT62uCZ575rE4qKDvK25QTB3AZ/lM6nJPGablv/80Xiyssj7DehjjzaFCJHl 47F3KfHMF4DxFgxJFY7p6aSUvG73IxLJj4qXpe1JcC+DuS2k9rgAXL1CeBXJrg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1756987408; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=aO4/VDZ6+Ro37p3Sg5sH+JqH4QTqEZlrPYPS0n5PHrFmX4vULhYfhbrKRnvsa7e3J3eliQ g1WC3yeeuWrKjFB/z/vg5DinnKj4TBngbV6EZCoQtQ1HaVkDdF/+GEWDIHLf5ItaCuxOXm ZMew+Nlp57OW37Qhu5etUqXr8oQHWmZ+NCrrrprN2E2QKxsQPJBxARcq7K2J+vSVg+PtuJ k/RtGHLw/3/vpZdFvHaKwA+82gbi7Bq4jJrmWK6K+/bQyQkm0wY39AHma/oIjs1H9tMwBP vrHeiqYwr2ySc36WgcNm2MTQzRpnn6ReDhq0GlietCKlBiELi2B4L6ue0altxg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from amaryllis.le-fay.org (amaryllis.le-fay.org [IPv6:2a00:1098:6b:400::9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: ivy/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4cHdRM5Hddz85N; Thu, 04 Sep 2025 12:03:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 13:03:19 +0100 From: Lexi Winter To: Ronald Klop , net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bridge new vlan and iftagged "none" Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Ronald Klop , net@freebsd.org References: <481902534.1074.1756977663370@localhost> <1a91faca-69ef-410d-95ad-2d371c84f759@klop.ws> List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="241qebcUG/LgZ9bU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --241qebcUG/LgZ9bU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Lexi Winter: > Ronald Klop: > > With the story above is the patch still needed? I will test anyway to > > see what happens. It is a RPI4, so compiling is a bit slow. >=20 > i was able to reproduce the problem here so it's not too important to > test that if it's a hassle. =20 there's a better patch at [0]. if you are going to test this, i'd appreciate it if you'd test that rather than the patch i originally sent. sorry, i realise compiling on that hardware does take a while :-) [0] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D52380 --241qebcUG/LgZ9bU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQSyjTg96lp3RifySyn1nT63mIK/YAUCaLmABAAKCRD1nT63mIK/ YAE7AQC/B99fAdm08WSVbt0sh4ekXREJbWg8LCl2/DENOIPEfwEAyNS3P0Ma2pUO PD6OdVOz84rzf67MDFD+iav0MmW9Ews= =O319 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --241qebcUG/LgZ9bU--