Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
- In reply to: Sad Clouds : "Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 17:44:51 UTC
Dnia Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 06:16:18PM +0100, Sad Clouds napisaĆ(a): > Hi, I'm using FreeBSD-14.1 and on this particular system I only have a > single physical network interface, so I followed instructions for > networking vnet jails via epair and bridge, e.g. > > devel > { > vnet; > vnet.interface = "e0b_devel"; > exec.prestart += "/jails/jib addm devel genet0"; > exec.poststop += "/jails/jib destroy devel"; > } > > The issue is bulk TCP performance throughput between this jail and the > host is quite poor, with one CPU spinning 100% in kernel and others > sitting mostly idle. > > It seems there is some lock contention somewhere, but I'm not sure if > this is around vnet, epair or bridge subsystems. Are there > other alternatives for vnet jails? Can anyone recommend specific > deployment scenarios? I've seen references to netgraph which could be > used with jails. Does it have better performance and scalability and > could replace epair and bridge combination? > > Thanks. Have you tried to use kernel built with "options RSS" ? From my experience it could help in some specific scenarios. -- Marek Zarychta