From nobody Thu Oct 17 00:15:52 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XTSzp3LfWz5ZBkZ for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:16:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Received: from fout-a8-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a8-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.151]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XTSzn45zRz4MwF for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:16:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=f-m.fm header.s=fm2 header.b=NvS6xlWM; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=RliyV8ou; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of void@f-m.fm designates 103.168.172.151 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=void@f-m.fm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=f-m.fm Received: from phl-compute-12.internal (phl-compute-12.phl.internal [10.202.2.52]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856DC13803A9 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 20:16:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-12.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 16 Oct 2024 20:16:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=f-m.fm; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1729124164; x=1729210564; bh=dX2eJ3iiSK wVs6yP+5K8PwZJ1aRR6WNHnVs71I5T7gA=; b=NvS6xlWMgpG0mDDsyVtsUmVtWh u9HxXScMKZgbyGmmJMtCibJGp9pfqdYzoYUdgE3vS2uPgvrGYZChbpVRG+7ZJDxv FPpJwAbDQtRbKTCkKbH9RvZ5DQ6RPF2j+2sKVRinOhrkSfV8HlwtyXxgdDGc/xlK xYsKzOoOVKUG5EVL1SiO77D9qO7zEfBM90NUMq9Ys+i0K/PsBPFGkMTxLc+ImXsJ Kzs3XdL2yp0Hwa9W3lq52LeM69XxvePa26Cbv2emIqKOMovt/vo7vLMtcJWSQ2Y/ G8CWU9mtsl8YXk/ETw46kgHHwJTQxTDOjKA49eWIHZuav4PwvcF3WytdPBEw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1729124164; x=1729210564; bh=dX2eJ3iiSKwVs6yP+5K8PwZJ1aRR 6WNHnVs71I5T7gA=; b=RliyV8ouEvcZvSarrAi8mFeSgLrBhjQ3P4hyQaZlqi8L TjRIbP462BV2EoPIe0ita7zsEOGAqfr2060Z4RkGq1AV+z2SF9nxjNB0j66rfcus H1Erdg+3pPfb6UX7E9qqETSqKVx4AedzbuRQCadqQoDu1mJcxfWdepDlILNdZevW 5y6LvhU0WccfoYI7Dn6Fuiq1mxkoU4kfMH+Z1yeqZzbQFlvFeYMR/GKkzehXlWT3 cfxU22cj2K0pzWeMYOu1rwGHmKLIlrLORsxtSFffNQaFp+PW150cY1JPNyQBQyTt Z0VR9uSjZyxQGsXgoTrNtkbHq2Z/6ZmTNd7xlvH/ww== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrvdehtddgfeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuf fkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvhhoihguuceovhhoihgusehfqdhm rdhfmheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepleevvefhheeffeffheefffekvedvfffgtdffje fhfedvgeelveevudejjeejleehnecuffhomhgrihhnpehushgvrhdrfhhmnecuvehluhhs thgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepvhhoihgusehfqdhmrd hfmhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohep fhhrvggvsghsugdqnhgvthesfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2541463c:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 20:16:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 01:15:52 +0100 From: void To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge Message-ID: References: <20240912181618.7895d10ad5ff2ebae9883192@gmail.com> List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.59 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.994]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[f-m.fm,none]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[f-m.fm:s=fm2,messagingengine.com:s=fm2]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:103.168.172.128/27]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[103.168.172.151:from]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[f-m.fm:+,messagingengine.com:+]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:151847, ipnet:103.168.172.0/24, country:AU]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4XTSzn45zRz4MwF X-Spamd-Bar: --- Hi, On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 09:48:58AM -0400, Cheng Cui wrote: >I am not sure if you are using FreeBSD15-CURRENT for testing in VMs. >But given your iperf3 test result has retransmissions, if you can try, there >is a recent VM friendly improvement from TCP congestion control CUBIC. I did some further testing, also rack v. non-rack. http://void.f-m.fm.user.fm/speedtests-cubic.txt --