From nobody Sat Jul 13 07:49:55 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WLgbt2wVQz5QBmx for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2024 07:50:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from drew.franken.de (mail-n.franken.de [193.175.24.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.franken.de", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WLgbs47vkz54Jr; Sat, 13 Jul 2024 07:50:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:8958:56e7:6903:9ce1]) (Authenticated sender: micmac) by drew.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 901FC721E280D; Sat, 13 Jul 2024 09:49:56 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\)) Subject: Re: TCP_RACK, TCP_BBR, and firewalls From: tuexen@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 09:49:55 +0200 Cc: FreeBSD Net Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: To: Alan Somers X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.600.62) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail-n.franken.de X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:193.174.0.0/15, country:DE] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4WLgbs47vkz54Jr > On 13. Jul 2024, at 01:43, Alan Somers wrote: > > I've been experimenting with RACK and BBR. In my environment, they > can dramatically improve single-stream TCP performance, which is > awesome. But pf interferes. I have to disable pf in order for them > to work at all. > > Is this a known limitation? If not, I will experiment some more to > determine exactly what aspect of my pf configuration is responsible. > If so, can anybody suggest what changes would have to happen to make > the two compatible? A problem with same symptoms was already reported and fixed in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D43769 Which version are you using? Best regards Michael > > -Alan >