From nobody Wed Feb 28 15:41:14 2024 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TlJVN1cx1z5BnxL for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:41:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TlJVM5V7dz4s2S for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:41:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1709134875; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=kUJJ0cHg7+RWX9k7CjCFNLZg2G+EGYW36czfOMFTx1e5yQVCFpq8t4kfbspJ3x46qhQZiy /53mCjP2tz3VRUnNV3SbDsNRnyAlgjQPJ8ye5TcNe9vyE2GPuuoQRBp1NExVtXwy6Ls4DS OquRjgAcBCvMC6IRaYa07uWHueFUkAUbtGLqU6Do3NUTMjDVHbc3tIpeYxPTAR5TGnK9ti SKcDegh0Orf7vzdvItFKStAoLV/JPDbxO5bTkLETbUIMigO8JmrMgt1k00J2Xqh3GvX7HK lWVszvgimE6+DjU1Mu59tyns55i20b1dPvbDdgnh5RbsFFFG+KN1ZB6NR40WCw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1709134875; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CiBc9rwfBRB4cJfsxt5I+1EXlj7iVwyvTn+dkZaVpb4=; b=UVWPtkLnRiANpinsBUK6AxPUzFwqz6T1TJWzfFYYC6x0giPn1jj0xY3A2u0xZNAJgtoC8M kvYUCL0nl98+wB0ow44SqkHpawpR4qnX7VCO38u2YiET3/TZG2Lu3oO1+zYsPF2qSo9Sef /P0yYfNxKUAuyvhCISVooqPiT6wIF4bB8QxE7KaZNwL5XdxMNY7P0w0V24I99NacTBV6Re CwR6dgzk9BqPOTmmZ1/ePBfbwbAH+MPrO/W50cEbD7m8I+6P8ECplY8TL+4tAO80EDFKw7 D4OKq1yHJlpVWKR5hBA5RTIlc5+1jhsSXLU5XJRQHwQ0RjkbUwlEcqtxE1VvXQ== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TlJVM4VPxz13DF for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:41:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 41SFfFLw056745 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:41:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 41SFfFBm056743 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:41:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 277349] The net.inet.ip.source_address_validation should ignore CARP IP in backup state Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:41:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: glebius@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D277349 --- Comment #1 from Gleb Smirnoff --- I think we had discussion on this some time ago. I suggested to make the BACKUP IP address to be treated as non-local for all purposes except bind(2= ). Here is a patch to try. I did not test it, but it gives an idea on what am I talking about. It should change more that just source IP address validation. The main question is whether there are any scenario that the patch would break. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=