From nobody Fri Feb 23 20:50:30 2024 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ThMbX1Q0wz5BTtc for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 20:50:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ThMbX0N5zz401N for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 20:50:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1708721432; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=qtHvDoyXr7+Owdg962bR14SRg+kUWyV3xGh8ExR00YkyGviEhU2KsCLGalEZKysBEPBfR9 b+195DN8sYNOZfQITXcOthrkG2ym7eiQdMcxJPjok2IEOIvEnaXZsCPp0hHToN1KRGUfmw SEuWA9i7pLcOaUEZZa9hS86W+xOi2oGMJm/mPuuaJHusFuHY0UfPLCFVPLLuv4qBqt8jyK S5W20q6MEpRONF8QbjQanPJpkEH+xBKGtRpLdcn02Ux/J/5mPqjLsx8egsb/iqSgvMk+yh r8AqyAiZ8Ifhdxj6dPrQrdg7UE2hTilgkWe5Gv9rIAmVPGhSMaR76absfDcVNg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1708721432; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iZyC4Sy8ZuuLHrLYCGfpqndAjDqvD1Zc6YsiYvfW+WY=; b=oGCFtbFXFHSRejfp2w0TaSjBtyjRtwjj2KuIBfxYXHRaUY7Ly4z2Ml5tqF+wIKtDouHPva QD4D/llvNztcqYzeGwsDkzClYy4mrq6UGdyufWgRSJmtD+J7fEjTTzyQA58dpwxk/fiDrJ F//OV96Yu65vfb7zOoRcMQM/G1YLkIdNcm5XQOPIbCTlVMg5GopwiE0LCCIapt9f5uWLWC PN6aG1lrfu6+2/9pTQrGvTHCwuYlFkTaRxcR6M1Ohoye3qSh+jXpvp73VfQyz6/F7OQXYz OGMRihdPJKDFjHq2KeSWAZC6V0feChZkO1h7LGqJsNUeK1ORvhHw8/ap4M1MkA== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ThMbW6YMJzX8K for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 20:50:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 41NKoV4v051620 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 20:50:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 41NKoVn9051619 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 20:50:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 276862] vnet doesnt release iface after running openvpn Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 20:50:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D276862 --- Comment #10 from Peter Much --- So, what do we do with this? Shall we declare it the recommended workaround to explicitely create the tun devices before starting openvpn instances, or should we try and figure out what went wrong with the former bugfix? Sorry to interrupt, but I have a bit too many dangling issues currently... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=