Re: per-FIB socket binding
- In reply to: Bjoern A. Zeeb: "Re: per-FIB socket binding"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 02:22:37 UTC
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > I wonder if anyone on FreeBSD is using FIBs to actually have multi-FIB > forwardig but that very little touches your use case apart from the mgmt > which again can be factored out better (or inversely, factoring out the > forwarding). > > I would honestly know who and how FIBs are still in use today or if they > should be put on a list to be removed for 16 (I assume I might be > surprised). I hope that is a joke! FIBs are a must have for certain routing environments, and forcing them into a VNET jail would add to overheads, and not even work for applications that work with 2 or more FIBs in the same instance!