From nobody Sun Oct 01 21:02:56 2023 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4RzGkn0Frrz4vpcs for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 21:02:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RzGkm6Hxwz4XtD for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 21:02:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1696194176; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=RX/MgDKzPD0euSovqfBoLmHDX8xAmnyv2CAk+BkhV9e8urlO7jAsaa5gGT1H900MKUDaTm WUEpRG5WL4MlalDUnfPA99pmUO2KCocV0sj930o78wmpXWQDfas2wAOMHXuEzHHG7TcUfa gKyMkDtVRRoBhEjkEttVzMrRZ7pQgYY+J76DfEHqzg4ZLbh7GP4tO9C7ytiea4AyQzLMkc y98eFZzTgj0yghAtOYS2n81ODXDSUj1d55mfSoslqrVCe6EnHzajsvJfPdjV9GOtWIjgLR rqBQQM+INhBftsIBCBwlBYJXRUeskmEnHUTKRArV/A3ijtkluh10ZvcMWTz+8Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1696194176; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1SlmT0e9oY1khyALpjZkKqK7ReM8JiHf1i5R2U9ZBXE=; b=W3UL1gxupg6YWG1atOtMrVcQFay/vDjLUSk0AUW0cXHAriBUkmZjV9WE3kwXvshvn8lGTk rtfmvHEylUn+KFufJylBtZX4XVTR8OnIj0KxdLzwR3xx7ej+OYQtrfAi45ax349obAlpld QgjQqQy0iwW/xz2SjfM4N7TKTEa06hj9POXG1rbDKSXvYeCF6/dRXyOpfe1XT/43f8z0Dy FnpddKJ5ul8j+Rv6GPCIUe5AsFlw6FU8AO/8RILkU3uncLM8QbJk2ued5eiSTPJZkO0Zlz 2mou7VNp8O6T8jl6BlRKha1H1eK7jlhOi4lMJT9p/XYsLFu+K+z2v64eNGmqEw== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RzGkm5LvPzlYQ for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 21:02:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 391L2udg098805 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 21:02:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 391L2uLY098804 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 21:02:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 274009] in_pcblookup_hash_locked: invalid local address panic on sendto(2) to ipv4-mapped Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2023 21:02:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D274009 --- Comment #8 from Michael Tuexen --- (In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #6) I tested your patch in review D39215 and it resolves the issues. However, in other places inp_vflag is modified when using mapped addresses. I have done this dance in review D42031 and it resolves the panic, too. This seems to be consistent. I'm not sure which one is the correct approach. Is the intention of review D39215 than such a inp_vflag is not necessary anymore and can be removed fr= om the other places? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=