From nobody Fri Nov 10 17:04:03 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SRlXw6wlpz50BXZ for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2023 17:04:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imlegion1111@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ua1-x931.google.com (mail-ua1-x931.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::931]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SRlXw26sGz3cQj for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2023 17:04:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imlegion1111@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=auCeJra0; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of imlegion1111@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::931 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=imlegion1111@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com Received: by mail-ua1-x931.google.com with SMTP id a1e0cc1a2514c-7b9ff6d89e6so905780241.3 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2023 09:04:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1699635855; x=1700240655; darn=freebsd.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XK5zGf1PaaiYhWtM1c1Xq7r0QyAE/4gkSr9p79jn44Q=; b=auCeJra0syj8vTaMqMiBF7vP6Iu6w4rmuemdVBFhKYGxufDpzEnFa79fQQul9K9Nrq nV+N/Hgminqoax9yjbVCZ5y0f40OOtIkZBNGkP9gcWcdR1Br1hywUKVm8076TwMgcCSb q56R6hvZGjVSJ/FZy0tYNR0EHtLiQcrF+SiZDQVzrLcztjRCVEW8d07rzHHJitbgfI60 QZ/ERiY3xc0Wnq8z7TfFrvJYXYD92b4ZjYRPlwOdp9rNTKVb0PBdhhVtL1weinVKKWdN aaNV/PxS7hMQIiWJGzb5oY8rSjAgrcQyZ0uc07ThqOelOCO5hdyO8FW5VRLx9T1r7GMG Axdw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699635855; x=1700240655; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XK5zGf1PaaiYhWtM1c1Xq7r0QyAE/4gkSr9p79jn44Q=; b=PRCU0PRtuOe/cFhR8h3hGRoiXMQMtK6/B0PDex/SHTDP2vDrn1t5my2kx3BVNNtbvk zDoKDOMItp8hXbc6CCOOuQOxd5jFD5O3cOseFKCSHY7hOsdx6raQ9s0Qn5/FDqIms/hY ae+67WmDpzpbk60VzAxQRjGsFAkCtjlRTAKqYL4wuwtroFgz21tOlb3MpLybnk3fM9Mt nbKiw8PdA8OHcuybCGVhbVvmBUNcAim5bs0LTMMqSsEuXRYqcK10bwbTt1wPZcb1y6T8 Hs3k4s03ZLKzbkQ9caN0JeTvJvDsshwo5aOj/E6sKLNpQQk3ehIROWvA+ax/Z6nD9tbz gZNw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyUomtFdcBZzIuVK0g5UOlFRkL9BNJCTUIYlVZxC4lpc/s1yMPb DaPIQVTHmzMpnE0PCU3hDHP7+Z5KMN9DYYIPizTe5zg5cOBSag== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE1eejrGlBok4wrW6ruIzZ+04f88Hw9oasDFZ6+CbdZUQ+Co0JG6o9w/YPzwwCo9sycz2kK+imaNF1qnGaiIHs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:4e22:b0:49d:efe:520c with SMTP id ge34-20020a0561224e2200b0049d0efe520cmr5687655vkb.12.1699635854880; Fri, 10 Nov 2023 09:04:14 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Johnny Test Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 12:04:03 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Redundant carp mesh best practices To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000060b5520609cf4f9d" X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.90 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.90)[-0.898]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20230601]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::931:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4SRlXw26sGz3cQj X-Spamd-Bar: --- --00000000000060b5520609cf4f9d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I have an ospf mesh running between routers 1, 2, 3 and 4. i have a bridge with a vether running on 1 and 2 each connecting to 3 and 4. i have a trunk running on 3 and 4 each connecting back to the previous 1 and 2. the reason for this setup is the bridge on 1 and 2 faciliates transferring the carp multicast frame between 3 and 4. I=E2=80=99m wondering if this is = the current best practice or is there a better way? Image: https://i.redd.it/4i1lu4aeydzb1.jpg Thanks! --00000000000060b5520609cf4f9d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi, I have an ospf mesh ru= nning between routers 1, 2, 3 and 4. i have a bridge with a vether running = on 1 and 2 each connecting to 3 and 4. i have a trunk running on 3 and 4 ea= ch connecting back to the previous 1 and 2. the reason for this setup is th= e bridge on 1 and 2 faciliates transferring the carp multicast frame betwee= n 3 and 4. I=E2=80=99m wondering if this is the current best practice or is= there a better way?


Thanks!
--00000000000060b5520609cf4f9d--