[Bug 272089] FreeBSD -CURRENT panic: panic invalid slot (wg(4) related)
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 17:01:29 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272089
--- Comment #4 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=b08ee10c0646e683cd03c9e28f537d9a7ba306af
commit b08ee10c0646e683cd03c9e28f537d9a7ba306af
Author: Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org>
AuthorDate: 2023-06-21 18:56:58 +0000
Commit: Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org>
CommitDate: 2023-06-23 17:00:09 +0000
wg: fix a number of issues with module load failure handling
If MOD_LOAD fails, then MOD_UNLOAD will be called to unwind module
state, but wg_module_init() will have already deinitialized everything
it needs to in a manner that renders it unsafe to call MOD_UNLOAD
after (e.g., freed zone not reset to NULL, wg_osd_jail_slot not reset
to 0). Let's simply stop trying to handle freeing everything in
wg_module_init() to simplify it; let the subsequent MOD_UNLOAD deal with
it, and let's make that robust against partially-constructed state.
jhb@ notes that MOD_UNLOAD being called if MOD_LOAD fails is kind of an
anomaly that doesn't match other paradigms in the kernel; e.g., if
device_attach() fails, we don't invoke device_detach(). It's likely
that a future commit will revert this and instead stop calling
MOD_UNLOAD if MOD_LOAD fails, expecting modules to clean up after
themselves in MOD_LOAD upon failure. Some other modules already do this
and may see similar problems to the wg module (see: carp). The proper
fix is decidedly a bit too invasive to do this close to 14 branching,
and it requires auditing all kmods (base + ports) for potential leaks.
PR: 272089
Reviewed by: emaste
MFC after: 3 days
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D40708
sys/dev/wg/if_wg.c | 28 +++++++++-------------------
sys/dev/wg/wg_cookie.c | 9 ++++++++-
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.