From nobody Thu Feb 16 15:28:15 2023 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PHf3M6FsKz3qZRs for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 15:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PHf3M58Stz3r2M for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 15:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1676561295; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OMSkxGWelJd+PbUIPTGzpgIruWmVJ12Gs8iMbHbOtd0=; b=bt+Lj+2sul/8yfWVw3QtAhs6/pNDmzfmw7j4TQHRaGrRaCBhNspMTu6C/aSmZaq24pe8+w sVoGQe2W2jDU714ceZcq2Wc3r9AKtK3sF66zUyU+JCPwUMSHli8s/5vZv3vxCnvE7M83ex /ueP9zysp/fdP+wl3/U2rIszpaDKRJ5PukxLaALTqJlV40RWSlaHaG2e0KbjbLJvqySK43 GpUyJ5mCV5YBsCm/oKkcL6nwBeRxJEgFJ3GVPBGXUC8hya1WnGQ+5npBhf+t0f3dKPl184 5D5zXgnx1yiDpsELjdDR2XLdchJd5FqSVlm/v21ynZGglHyPbpRL0fw5ZoNESA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1676561295; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=bUMWRTqgsOwzjwlVv+GPGS0rhSz8xXOxWOf9WJqCTvloJTuuezUaqyhnudTMaBzChzeSxc 56UJ8Bzzn3dPg6rFQ3BYnDRjE+mHORQT6vVtHHG5mBmmYrIdStqJekyoKMT4VcM1P+pDcT j8AkJrm/zgg77c0RhVSa3hAXfNHbydXc+IUGsVqj5IiCHjL9aEHG0Vx96kyaZg1XPCAPxA adUs4LQdicqBBW6aAxwnOoNsha6i/dRGbIV6cQXH5drblcR4sIdL8SDi4hN/sZXl2AfQXZ W7u0nnnOp+FJ8DsBAs/8uwbmvz5xzujch95SjYLE+4xBvk/jepPmWNqJY0/6XA== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PHf3M4Fg1z18BK for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 15:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 31GFSF7E080344 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 15:28:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 31GFSF5l080343 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 15:28:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 268490] [igb] [lagg] [vlan]: Intel i210 performance severely degraded Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 15:28:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.4-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: franco@opnsense.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D268490 --- Comment #24 from Franco Fichtner --- Hi Daniel, Yes, at least once in your original state to verify the commit you found unmasks the real cause of the degradation. If that is the case the initial= old commit you started the bisect on would not drop performance using this patc= h. Or it would, but then this might reach back even more. Yet I'm only speculating about it. Cheers, Franco --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=