From nobody Wed Feb 15 14:14:29 2023 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PH0Sk2psyz3qMxW for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:14:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PH0Sk1jBNz3DLw for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:14:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1676470470; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YUP068q0AtHa3eHA5pqBmajoKKcwY3fcKTFZX5DiDvc=; b=g/GY+ad71Dnl8KC6RzkgSW3zpzhKLeTIYPRdyaatoiPyBCDlLiiGFtgwzUM9NTFq3UZmlX AKRUvN3cwP2698VC2wKr2Xxr6IKE7E+T/Y5t+dsphZ/RQ1iWhNaihioc1sqf9iJzEwTKkV nPi7uxzIhZWAuypta8FoA1Eo9t8f3hgYj7X3mJjcksUjocdDhUubokTSdWy3pYSpKiKKMH hZxmGAgM/7HpO9Q3xLY1hPaqcK+BZSbtvZr+4E5AdHHqMjB4fPEsjoDveEWN9NWNfHlDy+ mIknRnDgPWklzGEPSyNYbeL0w7SkxPrHxexh1Re36go6AZy2lmlFAIh8eT01LA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1676470470; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=jMTFP+LSy6LAaiX+MIXi6koLr7X1Y7yr+YpRXuJEK0TWfcnmtwv9swvzY/3VWKTVUqvpVt 3HypZdjTUVNZaNRuQAIryl3vmjT6K6+5c+qaUctGnYo25mwwVh8vME2O5rO5BVbAOqG0Rk juYv9dFMdnMVW/Q0iHuEBI932wnUBJToJ2xJ2uRdGAtNAIzYNiLY9KuQkK+wkVVIzdzp7w dM7ExcGCwiZtyGOKBYfiKOyv48GQluFlaZUFX+q+w8XvxVyDvODQSvNW7dPCmfJWz+IRZH 64ALHPQo/IkfDOe+7gLsrU5E5MzqIFg6xVH0iUeKgD3I/l3jZjngXWhTXNFn/A== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PH0Sk0gP9zRgK for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:14:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 31FEEUHW088072 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:14:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 31FEEUHh088071 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:14:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 268490] [igb] [lagg] [vlan]: Intel i210 performance severely degraded Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:14:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.4-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: duerrd561@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D268490 --- Comment #14 from Daniel Duerr --- (In reply to Franco Fichtner from comment #13) Thank you, Franco. I tested what you suggested here but I do not see a chan= ge. Here's my `ifconfig` output before (the PROMISC flag is missing as you suggest): igb0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 9000 options=3D800028 ether 00:25:90:d6:e6:72 media: Ethernet 1000baseT status: active nd6 options=3D29 igb1: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 9000 options=3D800028 ether 00:25:90:d6:e6:72 hwaddr 00:25:90:d6:e6:73 media: Ethernet 1000baseT status: active nd6 options=3D29 And here are the baseline `iperf -s` test numbers to match: [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 1] 0.00-79.38 sec 60.0 Bytes 6.05 bits/sec [ 2] 0.00-76.85 sec 60.0 Bytes 6.25 bits/sec [ 3] 0.00-56.37 sec 60.0 Bytes 8.52 bits/sec [SUM] 0.00-98.92 sec 180 Bytes 14.6 bits/sec I then made the change you suggested: [root@nfs dd]# ifconfig igb0 promisc [root@nfs dd]# ifconfig igb1 promisc Which is reflected in the `ifconfig` output: igb0: flags=3D28943 metric 0 mtu 9000 options=3D800028 ether 00:25:90:d6:e6:72 media: Ethernet 1000baseT status: active nd6 options=3D29 igb1: flags=3D28943 metric 0 mtu 9000 options=3D800028 ether 00:25:90:d6:e6:72 hwaddr 00:25:90:d6:e6:73 media: Ethernet 1000baseT status: active nd6 options=3D29 But the `iperf -s` numbers are still terrible: [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 1] 0.00-68.47 sec 60.0 Bytes 7.01 bits/sec [ 2] 0.00-48.60 sec 60.0 Bytes 9.88 bits/sec [ 3] 0.00-28.25 sec 60.0 Bytes 17.0 bits/sec [SUM] 0.00-70.48 sec 180 Bytes 20.4 bits/sec Do I need to adjust the `lagg` interface to replicate your test, given I'm running inside of a `lagg` interface? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=