RE: Too aggressive TCP ACKs
- Reply: tuexen_a_freebsd.org: "Re: Too aggressive TCP ACKs"
- In reply to: tuexen_a_freebsd.org: "Re: Too aggressive TCP ACKs"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 08:08:38 UTC
>>>> It focuses on QUIC, but congestion control dynamics don't change >>>> with the protocol. You should be able to read there, but if not I'm >>>> happy to send anyone a pdf. >>> Is QUIC using an L=2 for ABC? >> >> I think that is the rfc recommendation, actual deployed reality is >> more scattershot. >Wouldn't that be relevant? If you get an ack for, let's say 8 packets, you would only increment (in slow start) the cwnd by 2 packets, not 8? > >Best regards >Michael Isn't that the optimization in Linux with QuickAck during the periods, where the data receiver assumes, that the sender is still in SlowStart - and acking every packet? Richard