From nobody Mon Aug 01 09:26:00 2022 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4LxCRD4VDzz4Y69t for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 09:26:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LxCRD0jrPz3b9m for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 09:26:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LxCRC6jTqzShq for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 09:25:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 2719Pxho056692 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 09:25:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 2719PxDj056691 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 09:25:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237973] pf: implement egress keyword to simplify rules across different hardware Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 09:26:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: feature, needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: meka@tilda.center X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1659345960; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eIv1hYTDU2Fqjw5vejrkd61m0aZbxglfI2YF28Feyqs=; b=tXs/liv6Sy/PepwObA1N0QuEG3tU/mPH4cIIp+XJrEi29p4OgNBWikIAxXBB0w7wC6pS+Z eN1PxjrgNpqrJCLTkbRpmpLxqFi/N5yZBLuQlm08r6W5lBltLlrhLbFG0yMMitEOIn1ARQ AtqwZI4GHwjGexGNG/7t6URBzowkzdixRraZW+CYwKfvawqUzbnnqNzBhw2+U3hkCnaTZQ 9kc31ajvCoJ3nYmKQNxcueg9+n7h+9JgRLeGZnGiVQr54nQt7qOzcdNfJoXm6HkfLkAggu oak85nCV+UZLfek+UfbgvrTLykwVPQYOCoLyCveC1XL4UbFGmPB/YUZz/aWqXA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1659345960; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=wooenWxgVPFStoK37ocqxxesxkVumMtF9+qccaarYXQY0ktXgMbcEblu8v4ZY94CYw3x0R 8H14bA/Fe8JAdTyi7P8hK1tq5euN5Mabaq0czyWDRjneonSxRBRqB9TLM0WxFzqWyM/zOD UMLHYNXo5D5Ub0PbqyqUzenLXe8jjoeQWbFnyXGIIiZvCtq2jFNS2Kykmx5wgtImITsjsb 3aytX084sFNW7ByDrZDFjelk/rob2uZ5nRjozFGE3yiCajF2jIGNhsGilojfQlKqVkf+mC cXqVhvKtpON3UbnmUOwq90l1Lx+8SWewRUyzWxwPKHwI4hoXU6KXflnx2tBV2Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237973 --- Comment #15 from Goran Meki=C4=87 --- (In reply to Alexander V. Chernikov from comment #14) Continuing on what you wrote, I can see PF implementing something internal, then IPFW doing similar and we end up with a need for common implementation, which got me wondering should existing grouping algorithm be altered so that groups are per FIB? Of course, groups like bridge, lagg and epair, just to = name the few, should be present in all FIBs on the corresponding interfaces. I k= now it's far from trivial to do such a thing, but just thinking about it, with = the knowledge I currently (don't) have it sounds like it would be beneficial to many apps if groups were per FIB. What do you all think? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=