From nobody Mon Sep 20 23:04:18 2021
X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
	by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D18C178DB52
	for <freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 23:04:35 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified))
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HD0W71Szzz3R9t
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 23:04:35 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221] (may be forged))
	by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 18KN4Q2G010292
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 23:04:27 GMT
	(envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net
X-Envelope-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadvw [10.58.0.10])
	by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 18KN4Ppt069141
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT);
	Tue, 21 Sep 2021 06:04:25 +0700 (+07)
	(envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Subject: Re: Performance of PPPOE in FreeBSD
To: driesm.michiels@gmail.com, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
References: <001001d7ae56$3c204fd0$b460ef70$@gmail.com>
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
Message-ID: <045c2921-bc3b-d3c7-893f-edf2f823eeb2@grosbein.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 06:04:18 +0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.8.0
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:freebsd-net+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:freebsd-net+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <001001d7ae56$3c204fd0$b460ef70$@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
	autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Report: 
	* -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT No description available.
	* -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HD0W71Szzz3R9t
X-Spamd-Bar: ----
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	none
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00];
	 TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[];
	 REPLY(-4.00)[]
X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N

21.09.2021 2:32, driesm.michiels@gmail.com wrote:

> I have also found some mentions of net/mpd5, is this a better
> implementation?

Basically, it all depends on available CPU horsepower and if you have plenty of it unused,
you can stick with base ppp(8). But in any case, net/mpd5 provides huge CPU usage decrease
and it will give you more speed if the router found CPU-bound.