Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2021 08:35:25 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256393 --- Comment #23 from Eugene Grosbein <email@example.com> --- (In reply to Rodney W. Grimes from comment #21) > Suggest? No, my words are stronger than that. The KERNEL should NOT implement ANY routing policies. A loopback route IS a routing policy. I'm not sure I understand what "routing policies" mean in general. Nevertheless, I'd like we have some knob (sysctl?) to optionally preserve current behaviour when kernel assigns loopback routes, so packet filters still deal with local traffic as going through loopback interface, BPF "sees" it on lo0 too etc. Too many things will break if we just remove loopback routes unconditionally. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.