Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 00:36:03 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259787 --- Comment #18 from Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> --- I definitely want/need a feedback from ports maintainers. In particular: 1. Should sched_getaffinity(3), sched_setaffinity(3), and sched_getcpu() prototypes be available regardless of _WANT_CPU_SET_T? I suppose that yes, but need a direct answer. 2. Should cpu_set_t typedef available under _WANT_CPU_SET_T or just under _BSD_VISIBLE? I do not have an opinion there, and suspect that removal of _WANT_CPU_SET_T could indeed simplify some ports. This is also some plan to stop exposing BIT_* API to userspace, so that it gets less conflicts with namespace poluution just by pulling sched.h. But this require some time to materialize. Is there anything else src can help ports? There is more stuff planned, see D32360 and D32505, but I expect these be much less problematic (sched_getaffinity() problems were indeed a surprise to me). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.