From nobody Thu Dec 22 16:04:22 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-jail@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NdFjW4d2Dz1G64x for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 16:13:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@freebsd.org) Received: from glebi.us (glebi.us [162.251.186.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NdFjV590Xz3mNW; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 16:13:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 162.251.186.162 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of glebius@freebsd.org) smtp.mailfrom=glebius@freebsd.org; dmarc=none Received: by glebi.us (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 061944EE96; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 08:04:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 08:04:22 -0800 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Kyle Evans Cc: Zhenlei Huang , "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , "freebsd-jail@freebsd.org" , Mark Johnston Subject: Re: What's going on with vnets and epairs w/ addresses? Message-ID: References: <5r22os7n-ro15-27q-r356-rps331o06so5@mnoonqbm.arg> <150A60D6-6757-46DD-988F-05A9FFA36821@FreeBSD.org> List-Id: Discussion about FreeBSD jail(8) List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-jail List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.59 / 15.00]; VIOLATED_DIRECT_SPF(3.50)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.91)[-0.910]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-jail@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com,freebsd.org]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[glebius]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all:c]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:27348, ipnet:162.251.186.0/24, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4NdFjV590Xz3mNW X-Spamd-Bar: + X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 10:52:58AM -0600, Kyle Evans wrote: K> It still behaved much better prior to eb93b99d6986, which you and Mark K> were going to work on a solution for to allow the cred "leak" to close K> up much more quickly. CC markj@, since I think it's been six months K> since the last time I inquired about it, making this a good time to do K> it again... I had a branch with a KPI to force purge SMR zone. That could be triggered by a sysctl or automatically from the jail code. I will look for it and share. Sorry for 4 day delay on this (and other topics), I've been mostly offline. I will reply to all mails on this thread before Monday. -- Gleb Smirnoff