Re: CC.freebsd.org mirrors still relevant?
- In reply to: John Hay : "Re: CC.freebsd.org mirrors still relevant?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 05:08:59 UTC
On 2024-05-28 12:35:54 (+0800), John Hay wrote:
> On Tue, 28 May 2024 at 06:04, Philip Paeps <philip@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> We (clusteradm) have been actively trying to phase out the cc.f.o
>> mirrors in favour of our own CDN with clusteradm-managed mirrors.
>> While
>> the asynchronous cc.f.o mirrors served us well in the 1990s and early
>> 2000s, our synchronised CDN is a better fit for the world we
>> currently
>> live in.
>>
>> Currently we have 14 sites around the world. We could use more. We
>> only have one mirror in Africa at JINX.
>>
>> If anyone wants to provide a {download,pkg,www}.FreeBSD.org site,
>> please
>> get in touch. We're particularly keen to hear from sites who can
>> provide hardware as well as connectivity.
>
> So for interest sake at least, what do you need in terms of hardware?
> Does
> it have to be physical? What would be needed in terms of access? Do
> you
> then maintain the software side? Or is there a writeup about it
> somewhere?
The setup at JINX is a single-machine installation, Intel E3-1220 v6,
32G memory, 8x4T drives. For new installations, we'd probably prefer
more memory -- we have at least 128G in the newer mirrors. We need at
least 12T usable space. We like mirrored pairs for both reliability and
disk I/O parallelism.
We need naked internet - legacy and IPv6. For single-machine
installations, we usually get a /28 on the 20th century internet and a
/64 on the 21st century internet. In most sites, we rarely fill a 1G
circuit.
There's a somewhat detailed writeup here:
https://wiki.freebsd.org/Teams/clusteradm/generic-mirror-layout
We manage the entire system. We only need local support if hardware
breaks.
The ZA mirror is fairly lightly loaded, and is well connected to most of
southern Africa. I see 50-60ms latency from machines in TZ and KE and
downloads at 40ish Mbit/s. I don't think another mirror in ZA would add
much value.
I don't have as convenient ways to test in northern/western Africa, but
I would be surprised if the situation weren't much worse... I'd love a
mirror in e.g. Lagos, Accra, or Dakar for faster downloads there.
Philip