Re: Current ULE state and plans (was Re: HMP scheduling on FreeBSD)
- In reply to: Minsoo Choo : "Re: Current ULE state and plans (was Re: HMP scheduling on FreeBSD)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 16:46:07 UTC
On 1/23/26 07:50, Minsoo Choo wrote: > On Friday, January 23rd, 2026 at 10:30 AM, David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On 22 Jan 2026, at 21:00, Minsoo Choo minsoochoo0122@proton.me wrote: >> >>> If we want real-world scenarios, phoronix test suite would be great. >> >> >> The Phoronix test suite is probably not helpful for schedulers. It runs a bunch of things one at a time, whereas schedulers care about dividing a shared resource among different things. It does a small number of samples and doesn’t do anything sensible with statistics to try to give you a useful number. It is a legendarily bad benchmark suite. >> >> David > > Doesn't come with stress-ng? > > https://www.phoronix.com/review/freebsd-15-amd-epyc/4 > > It gives numbers on mixed scheduler, context switching, etc, although I have no idea if that numbers are reliable. > > https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/benchmarks/stress-ng Looks like here is no need for phoronix to be involved in order to use stress-ng . -- === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com