Re: Review D58990: freebsd-update: automatically update EFI and BIOS bootloaders on install
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 18:17:40 UTC
Mark,
Would you be able to try this latest commit?
https://github.com/RZA-SF/freebsd-patch-for-bug279829/blob/revision-2/src/efi_bootloader_update.sh
Best,
Ron
On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 10:26 AM Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 8/20/26 08:26, Mark Millard wrote:
> > On 8/20/26 01:08, Ronald Pagani Jr (ronald.pagani.jr) wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 12:37 AM Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org
> >> <mailto:se@freebsd.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 19.08.26 um 18:30 schrieb Ronald Pagani Jr (ronald.pagani.jr):
> >> > I've submitted a patch to automatically update the EFI bootloader
> >> on the ESP
> >> > during freebsd-update install:
> >> >
> >> > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D58990 <https://reviews.freebsd.org/
> >> D58990> <https://reviews.freebsd.org/D58990 <https://
> >> reviews.freebsd.org/D58990>>
> >> >
> >> > The problem: freebsd-update updates /boot/loader.efi on the root
> >> filesystem,
> >> > but the UEFI firmware boots from loader.efi on the EFI System
> >> Partition — a
> >> > separate FAT32 partition that freebsd-update never touches. After
> >> a major
> >> > version upgrade the ESP loader can be left several versions stale.
> >> Since 14.1
> >> > removed the lua_path==nil compatibility shim from core.lua, this
> >> mismatch
> >> > produces a hard boot failure. If the user also ran zpool upgrade,
> >> the system is
> >> > completely unbootable without external media.
> >> >
> >> > The patch hooks efi_bootloader_update.sh into install_run() in
> >> freebsd-
> >> > update.sh. It auto-detects the ESP via gpart, fingerprints
> /EFI/BOOT/
> >> > BOOTx64.efi before touching it (multi-OS safe), creates /EFI/
> >> FreeBSD/loader.efi
> >> > if absent, updates NVRAM, and handles BIOS GPT bootcode as well.
> >> Opt-out via
> >> > UpdateBootloader=no in freebsd-update.conf.
> >> >
> >> > Tested on FreeBSD 14.0-RELEASE-p11 amd64 (UEFI, ZFS, NVMe). 197
> unit/
> >> > integration/error tests available at:
> >> >
> >> > https://github.com/RZA-SF/freebsd-patch-for-bug279829 <https://
> >> github.com/RZA-SF/freebsd-patch-for-bug279829> <https://github.com/
> >> RZA- <https://github.com/RZA->
> >> > SF/freebsd-patch-for-bug279829>
> >>
> >> I'm using a much simpler version that just covers my setup, and
> would
> >> like to replace it by a more general version.
> >>
> >> This fails for me in lines 231 to 236 since device names are
> expected,
> >> but zpool status returns a diskid based path:
> >>
> >> $ zpool status zroot
> >> pool: zroot
> >> state: ONLINE
> >> config:
> >>
> >> NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
> >> zroot ONLINE 0 0 0
> >> diskid/DISK-8ESKF03YZ0EAp2 ONLINE 0 0 0
> >>
> >> errors: No known data errors
> >>
> >> $ sh efi_bootloader_update.sh --dry-run
> >> freebsd-update: [bootloader] INFO: Boot method detected: UEFI
> >> freebsd-update: [bootloader] WARN: No boot disks found
> >> freebsd-update: [bootloader] WARN: Boot disk discovery failed
> >> freebsd-update: [bootloader] WARN: If using hardware RAID or an
> exotic
> >> topology, update the bootloader manually
> >>
> >> My version uses "gpart show -p" to list boot partitions and to fetch
> >> the corresponding device names:
> >>
> >> $ gpart show -p | grep -w efi
> >> 2048 522240 diskid/DISK-8ESKF03YZ0EAp1 efi (255M)
> >> 2048 522240 diskid/DISK-81S0A0K7FJDHp1 efi (255M)
> >> 2048 522240 diskid/DISK-81S0A0L1FJDHp1 efi (255M)
> >>
> >> > This is complementary to Warner Losh's D45890 (loader version-
> >> check warnings).
> >> > Feedback welcome.
> >> Regards
> >> STefan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I've just pushed a kern.disks implementation following recent review
> >> comments, and I'm wondering if that works for you?
> >>
> >> https://github.com/RZA-SF/freebsd-patch-for-bug279829/blob/revision-2/
> >> src/efi_bootloader_update.sh <https://github.com/RZA-SF/freebsd-patch-
> >> for-bug279829/blob/revision-2/src/efi_bootloader_update.sh>
> >>
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Ron
> >>
> >
> > On a Windows Dev Kit 2023 (with UFS) it gets: "freebsd-update:
> > [bootloader] INFO: Boot method detected: unknown"
> >
> > # sh -x efi_bootloader_update.sh --dry-run --verbose
> > + [ -n '' ]
> > + _EFI_BOOTLOADER_UPDATE_SH=1
> > + : /boot/loader.efi
> > + : 0
> > + : 0
> > + : 1
> > + : /boot/pmbr
> > + : /boot/gptzfsboot
> > + : /boot/gptboot
> > + _EFI_FINGERPRINT_THRESHOLD=2
> > + _efi_esp_mp=''
> > + _efi_esp_did_mount=0
> > + _efi_tmp_mounts=''
> > + _efi_script_name=efi_bootloader_update.sh
> > + [ efi_bootloader_update.sh '=' efi_bootloader_update.sh ]
> > + [ 2 -gt 0 ]
> > + EFI_DRY_RUN=1
> > + shift
> > + [ 1 -gt 0 ]
> > + EFI_VERBOSE=1
> > + shift
> > + [ 0 -gt 0 ]
> > + update_bootloaders
> > + local 'total_errors=0'
> > + local rc
> > + efi_check_prerequisites
> > + local 'ok=0'
> > + id -u
> > + [ 0 '!=' 0 ]
> > + sysctl -n security.jail.jailed
> > + [ 0 '=' 1 ]
> > + [ ! -f /boot/loader.efi ]
> > + [ ! -s /boot/loader.efi ]
> > + return 0
> > + rc=0
> > + local boot_method 'fallback_binary='
> > + efi_boot_method
> > + local m
> > + sysctl -n machdep.bootmethod
> > + m=''
> > + echo unknown
> > + return
> > + boot_method=unknown
> > + _efi_info 'Boot method detected: unknown'
> > + _efi_log 'INFO: Boot method detected: unknown'
> > + echo 'freebsd-update: [bootloader] INFO: Boot method detected:
> unknown'
> > freebsd-update: [bootloader] INFO: Boot method detected: unknown
> > + [ unknown '=' UEFI ]
> > + trap efi_cleanup_mounts EXIT INT TERM
> > + [ unknown '=' UEFI ]
> > + local bios_list
> > + efi_discover_all_bios_parts
> > + local disks
> > + sysctl -n kern.disks
> > + tr ' ' '\n'
> > + disks='da0
> > nda0'
> > + local disk 'found=0'
> > + [ -z da0 ]
> > + local parts
> > + gpart show da0
> > + awk -v 'd=da0' '$4 == "freebsd-boot" { print d, $3 }'
> > + parts=''
> > + [ -n '' ]
> > + [ -z nda0 ]
> > + local parts
> > + gpart show nda0
> > + awk -v 'd=nda0' '$4 == "freebsd-boot" { print d, $3 }'
> > + parts=''
> > + [ -n '' ]
> > + [ 0 -eq 0 ]
> > + return 1
> > + bios_list=''
> > + true
> > + [ -n '' ]
> > + [ 0 -gt 0 ]
> > + [ 1 '=' 1 ]
> > + _efi_info '[DRY RUN] Bootloader update complete (no changes made)'
> > + _efi_log 'INFO: [DRY RUN] Bootloader update complete (no changes
> made)'
> > + echo 'freebsd-update: [bootloader] INFO: [DRY RUN] Bootloader update
> > complete (no changes made)'
> > freebsd-update: [bootloader] INFO: [DRY RUN] Bootloader update complete
> > (no changes made)
> > + return 0
> > + exit 0
> > + efi_cleanup_mounts
> > + local mp
> > + _efi_tmp_mounts=''
> >
> > (I had reported the empty sysctl -n machdep.bootmethod result for the
> > context in the review, violating an assumption of the scripting. I've no
> > clue how common the empty result might be overall.)
> >
>
> I tried another (but unofficial) context: Booting a RPi5B via a
> draft/partial EDK2 on a microsd card and the FreeBSD materials
> (including ESP) on the internal NVMe. So, another UEFI/ACPI aarch64
> context:
>
> # sh -x efi_bootloader_update.sh --dry-run
> . . .
> + efi_boot_method
> + local m
> + sysctl -n machdep.bootmethod
> + m=''
> + echo unknown
> + return
> + boot_method=unknown
> + _efi_info 'Boot method detected: unknown'
> + _efi_log 'INFO: Boot method detected: unknown'
> + echo 'freebsd-update: [bootloader] INFO: Boot method detected: unknown'
> freebsd-update: [bootloader] INFO: Boot method detected: unknown
> . . .
>
> So the same issue. (There is no U-Boot context for that RPi5 context
> that I know of for FreeBSD.)
>
>
> I'll note (both aarch64):
>
> WinDevKit23:
> # efibootmgr
> BootCurrent: 0000
>
> RPi5:
> # efibootmgr
> Boot to FW : false
> BootCurrent: 0002
> Timeout : 5 seconds
> BootOrder : 0000, 0001, 0002, 0003
> Boot0000* UiApp
> Boot0001* UEFI SanDisk SE32G 4412AC09 SD Device
> +Boot0002* UEFI Timetec 35TTTN2242GE3P-1TB YS240913B1T0242 1
> Boot0003 UEFI Shell
>
> I do not know if the efibootmgr behavior intended always works. There is
> a notable difference in the default outputs above, WInDevKit23 possibly
> being odd.
>
> As for the amd64 system, just for reference:
>
> # efibootmgr
> Boot to FW : false
> BootCurrent: 0004
> Timeout : 1 seconds
> BootOrder : 0000, 0002, 0004, 0006, 0005, 0007, 0008
> Boot0000* Windows Boot Manager
> Boot0002* UEFI OS
> +Boot0004* UEFI OS
> Boot0006* UEFI OS
> Boot0005* UEFI OS
> Boot0007* UEFI OS
> Boot0008* UEFI OS
>
> (It actually boots Windows 11 Pro by default, even though that is
> normally not what I boot.)
>
> I'm avoiding touching the systems that I have access to.
>
>
> I may later see about trying an official U-boot based UEFI boot context
> on, say, an RPi4B.
>
>
> --
> ===
> Mark Millard
> marklmi at yahoo.com
>