Re: unionfs in jails

Hi Anthony,

I'm sorry, but I totally forgot this task.  Moreover:

> IIRC, there is no more to it than that.

we have had recently some bugs with jail escapes, at least one of them involving nullfs, specifically: PR 262180 / D50418.

So I think I need a bit of time (a few days at most) to assess that enabling unionfs in jails is fine.

Currently busy with other stuff, though, but will try to tackle it the week after next week.

> May I hope this change will appear in 14-STABLE?

14-STABLE, or 15-STABLE?  I'll probably do both anyway, but for 15.0 release there is a slight risk that we may not make it.

Thanks and regards.

-- 
Olivier Certner