Re: COMPAT_FREEBSD<ancient>
- In reply to: Konstantin Belousov : "Re: COMPAT_FREEBSD<ancient>"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 21:25:12 UTC
On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 18:31:10 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 08:07:01AM -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote: ... > > Two systems can have the same ABI (calling conventions, etc.) but not > > provide the same syscalls or libc functions, no? In such scenario, the > > binaries from one wouldn't run on the other. > > ABI defines the (whole) environment where the code from a binary is > executed. Your attempt to restrict ABI meaning only to some aspect of it > is not reasonable. Ah, I totally forgot that "System V Application Binary Interface" doc which includes a set of libc symbols, etc. I usually only ever look at the architecture specific supplements. Thanks for the reminder. I just stumbled on the ABI thread you started on freebsd-arch a month ago. It'd seem that I accidentally opened a can of worms you've spend a while thinking about. :) Jeff.